“In these times when the majority are giving a premonition of doom,
when you and I are watching the media and feeling something
sinister is going to loom when we are being bombarded with messages
of the catastrophe, of Corona Virus
and feeling gloom…
These times of using masks & sanitizers
and of not hugging or shaking hands with
friends or family members…
of these times when the world is being
painted with dark shades of hate and fear,
and the majority are seeing the world as a place
of bad fate & tear… you come out with positive vibes & energy
and use bright colors of love and warmth
and paint a beautiful rainbow
of hope & good old cheer”
― Avijeet Das
Self-discipline
There is another, defect in our upbringings among other things. We do not like to stand in “lines” or “queues”. We want to be the “first” by any “means” fair or foul though the former aspect is generally absent. This applies more to our so-called “rich” “moneyed” and the influential who think that it is below their dignity to do so. They do not realize that if they behave like that in the U.S., among others, that would be the first step to come back home.
This is the time for us to change. Circumstances warrant this transformation. Times are frightening and dangerous. There are various restrictions and regulations in vogue now which call for understanding, tolerance and wisdom to follow voluntarily and if not, at least to “comply” with them under pain of penalty. Yet, however, we find open defiance by certain sections of society which apart from putting themselves or their family in immediate threat will hazard innocent neighboring fellow citizens.
When I was in Pittsburg in the U.S. visiting the Hindu Temple of Shri Balaji (the first built in America) I observed a very curious phenomenon. Whereas, those who congregated on the premises would never think of “throwing” litter on streets, highways or any other public places like for instance in or at a shopping mall within or outside the premises, here, in the sacred portals of a holy place, all kinds of litter particularly, cans were being thrown onto the fenced greenery adjoining the temple. Despicable such attitude is, it is unfortunate that there was no body to tell them otherwise. There was (at that time) not even a signboard warning visitors against littering. How similar to their conduct at home where all sorts of litter is thrown about most casually even by many of the “foreign returned” people. Many of our people including “netas” go on “jaunts” abroad. I wonder how self-controlled they would be? The reason is not far to seek. They are afraid of the “consequences” under law or even by the local population itself. It is doubtful if they come back within the expiry of their visitor’s visas if they are prosecuted for breach of their pollution laws particularly in the United States and Singapore.
Self-discipline is called for as an utmost moral and legal duty. Should we not comprehend this at least now?
Everyone must stand in a queue with other passengers while boarding a flight and go through normal security drills. Why have special lounges for VIPs’ at the airports?
Simplicity and accessibility were the hallmark of erstwhile national leaders. We had lost the meaning of these two, among other, qualities in our present times. That is because we had lot of people standing on the podia and claiming to be leaders and vying with each other to get into picture frames. Most of such people did not have or do not have a modicum of leadership qualities. All they hankered after were for privileges and more amenities including escorts and a red beacons on roof tops of their vehicles. They had not given up their spitting and other despicable habits. In any event, the security rings provided to them at the cost of citizens immunized them from public scrutiny.
Narendra Modi has changed the culture of the many of such so called leaders. Himself a pure soul, he does not want anything except the welfare of people. His entire energies and time available is utilized in this behalf. He CARES for the people without discrimination. He is stoic at the oppositions’ needless personal attacks and criticism. We, in general, are austere in the realm of leadership. Our present Prime Minister is an exception and is an outstanding and excellent person of an indescribable calibre or genre. His simplicity and self-discipline has become legendary. It might be relevant to note that when he had gone to the U.S. in October, 2014 (so soon after his installation as the Prime Minister) to address the General Assembly of the United Nations, he had also availed of the opportunity of visiting the White House to meet the U.S. President Barack Obama. It would please all to know that in an official dinner hosted by the U.S. President, Narendra Modi, who was fasting for those nine days of the Indian Festival NAVARATRI partook only hot water and sustained on YOGA making President Obama wonder how “Modi kept up such a rigorous schedule on just a diet of warm water and yoga…” Our Prime Minister, Narendra Modi has been very keen and has devised many ways of interacting with his fellow citizens. At the conclusion of his visit Modi made the following VISION statement:
“We have a vision that the United States and India will have a transformative relationship as trusted partners in the 21st century, the “vision statement said”.
When Her Majesty the Queen Elizabeth I swore Sir William Cecil as the Secretary of State at her accession her confidence in him was spellbinding:
This judgment I have of you that you will not be corrupted by any manner of gift and that you will be faithful to the state and that without respect for my private will you will give me that counsel that you think best.
Similarly, the following statement of President George W. Bush while commending Mr. Justice Alberto Gonzales for Attorney- General of the U.S. tells us as to what constitutes leadership:
His sharp intellect and sound judgment have helped shape our policies in the war on terror — policies designed to protect the security of all Americans, while protecting the rights of all Americans. As the top legal official on the White House staff, he has led a superb team of lawyers and has upheld the highest standards of government ethics. My confidence in Al was high to begin with; it has only grown with time.
Over the past decade, I’ve also come to know the character of this man. He always gives me his frank opinion. He is a calm and steady voice in times of crisis. He has an unwavering principle, a respect for the law … I’m committed to strong, and principled leadership at the Department of Justice and Judge Al Gonzales will be that kind of leader as America’s 80th Attorney General.
It is a matter of sadness that, as a people, we idolize all and sundry standing on a podium even without their need to being there. We have been encouraged to believe that India is a poor nation consisting of poor people and that without the crutches of governmental support, would be unable to stand upon our own feet. Years of subjugation and servitude produced sycophancy in people’s DNA. “Leaders” dinned to the eager ears of those who mattered and listened to, that the country did not have the wherewithal for progress; that it did not have adequate resources for investment on agriculture, education, and infrastructure and for manufacturing goods. They indoctrinated innocents that the only alternative left to starving was distribution of poverty among all by taxing everything that looked rich except the corrupt and the select few who alone were licensed to thrive in islands of prosperity amidst an ocean of poverty.
In these circumstances, I feel pleasure in recalling the attitude of people who in spite of having the requisites to be called “BIG” go through life in simplicity. There is an incident I recollect when late Rajiv Gandhi was a passenger next to me after the aisle. Of course, this was long before the tragic events that overtook our country after the demise of Prime Minister, Smt.Indira Gandhi and before he was inducted into public life and later as Prime Minister of the country. Not wanting to miss a fine opportunity of talking to a man like him, I went up to him after we were airborne and talked to him. He spoke without any airs at all. His simplicity and kind eyes astonished me. I asked him if I could have his autograph and having no notepad gave him my boarding card and pen for the purpose. As I was taking the pen back from him it fell down when he apologized for it and bent to pick it up for me. It must be emphasized that these instances are a rarity at present times. May be we might blame it on the personal security surrounding such important public figures.
In the beginning after independence, leaders who mattered did not want to think big for fear of losing the image of socialism-a euphemism for poverty distribution. The focus was on scarcity. Many ambitious proposals including interlinking of the country’s major rivers known as the Inter-River Linking Project (IRL) have been mired in great controversies. One of the main issues facing water resources management in India has been the unevenly distributed water supply throughout the country. The IRL would have helped the nation in so many ways not the least of which was a boost for transportation and agriculture.
The matter lingered until the President of India revived it on the eve of the country’s 59th Independence Day, (August 15, 2002) in which he spoke of the importance of interlinking:
“Rainfall and floods are annual features in many parts of the country. Instead of thinking on interlinking of rivers only at times of flood and drought, it is time that we implement this programme with a great sense of urgency. We need to make an effort to overcome various hurdles in our way to the implementation of this major project. I feel that it has the promise of freeing the country from the endless cycle of floods and droughts.”
The matter of IRL is now before the Apex Court in response to a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed before it in October 2002.The court recommended the setting up of a Task Force to formulate a plan to link major Indian rivers by the year 2012 now extended to 2016. The government of India in December of the same year appointed a Task Force (TF) on Interlinking of rivers.
The debate in the matter is endemic because the subject is not free of doubts and fears.
Things were looking bleak on the Indian horizon until the early nineties when India awakened to a new dawn of developmental thinking.
Among one of the major accomplishments of India’s 21st century is the energy initiative. Nuclear Power is expected to provide a quarter of the nation’s electricity by 2050.
The unfortunate reality is corruption and wastage. Studies apprehend that “as much as 30 to 50 percent of the electricity generated in India may be lost along the delivery chain. Better maintenance and modernizing of cooling systems could significantly reduce the amount of energy needed to generate power.” The key to expanding India’s prosperity is through energy production, which implies investment in efficiency and integrity. It is in this context therefore that a speech made by Smt. Sonia Gandhi, Congress President, on 19th November 2010, at the 10th Indira Gandhi Conference titled ”An Indian Social Democracy : Integrating Markets, Democracy and Social Justice” at the Teen Murti House was bold and encouraging notwithstanding whatever flak she might receive at the hands of her detractors. As a shadow head of the then government, she acknowledged the problem of corruption and the moral challenges facing Indian society. Two aspects of her statement are significant:
“Graft and greed are on the rise. The principles on which independent India was founded, for which a generation of great leaders fought and sacrificed their all, are in danger of being negated.”
“Our economy may increasingly be dynamic, but our moral universe seems to be shrinking. Prosperity has increased, but so has social conflict. Intolerance of various kinds is growing… We are right to celebrate our high rate of economic growth. We must do all that we can to sustain it. However, let us not forget that growth is not an end in itself.”
She stated that India could not hide behind the growth story. Corruption, if not addressed, may turn into the biggest blockage in progress of India. Her speech gained benefit when the nation’s Prime Minister who inaugurated the conference echoed the same sentiments. Saying that we were living through a “momentous phase in the history of the social evolution of humankind”, Dr.Singh, the former Prime Minister reminded people that it was in the “minds of the people” that battles of ideas were “won or lost”.
We sought freedom to liberate ourselves from centuries of misrule, from the scourge of poverty, ignorance and disease, from tyranny and bigotry, from caste prejudice and communal divisions. Thus, the Constitution of India was a unique social charter – the boldest statement ever of social democracy.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi has tried to reign in the activities of the government and has cautioned people against imitating Western countries and venture in for more growth for mere generation of more revenues. He warned that while higher growth created more wealth that could be invested in human and social development; it also led to greater inequalities simultaneously increasing expectations of the people at large. Underscoring that there was already a revolution of rising expectations underway in India that any government has to take note of, the greater challenge facing the nation was getting rid of the cancer of corruption in our public life. In this context therefore, India needed revitalizing institutions of development administration, which could deliver effectively our promise of livelihood security, the Right to Education, to employment, to food and to shelter.
The Prime Minister Mr. Modi has assured people of his administrative philosophy namely, “of less government and more of governance”. The administration of such a huge country with diverse compulsions each day is a daunting task.
Public administration in a democracy has to achieve a delicate balance. Bureaucracy must be powerful enough to be effective, yet accountable to elected officials and, ultimately, to the people. At this juncture it is relevant to point out the when in the year 2000 the NDA government moved for a comprehensive review of the working of the Indian Constitution on the experience of its working for over 50 years, the then opposition party namely the Congress and the left parties also rejected the idea of having a fixed term for the Lok Sabha on the ground the it would render the elected representatives unaccountable to citizens for the entire period of five years. Nevertheless they were willing to discuss any amendments the would strengthen the system of No-Confidence Motions in order to ensure that a government stays in power unless voted out by a two-thirds majority or more. It appears the when President K.R. Narayanan (as of then) cautioned the government against “revising” the Constitution, or the Parliamentary form of government, it was Mr. Lal Krishna Advani who prevailed on the Prime Minister to issue the necessary clarification, after a Cabinet meeting, that the proposed review would be within the framework of Parliamentary form of government and that the basic features of the Constitution would be out of its purview.
Accomplishment of such a delicate balance is of the essence of any good governance. Students like me, and those who are in or concerned with governance of people who have or placed their trust in them ought to be excited to note with gratification, of the considerable attention to such issues. Political scientists like Donald F. Kettl and James W. Fesler have concluded that the purpose and content of public goods lies in its “delivery for public good” and for this to happen effectively the outlook of the bureaucrat has to be studied in the “perspective of the bureaucracy existing within a series of Chinese boxes”. The immediate box is that of the bureaucratic ethos which itself exists “within the box of the governmental environment.”
It is said the this “incredible complexity of these multiple layers of the bureaucrat’s make-up has to be analyzed and understood if an effective intervention for change is to be made.” Their opinion is that India has excellent laws but these alone are not enough for safeguarding public welfare or be effective “in the face of the all-pervasive rent-seeking behavior of the administration” In his opinion there is “palsy at the Centre and paralysis at the periphery’.
It is relevant to refer to our Supreme Court’s exhortations time and again to the bureaucracy that as trustees of society they are duty bound to exhibit “honesty, integrity, sincerity and faithfulness in implementation of the political, social, economic and constitutional policies to integrate the nation, to achieve excellence and efficiency in the public administration”. One of the said authors quotes Dr. B.R. Ambedkar.
In a paper presented before the International Law and Economic Conference at New Delhi in 2003, Mr. Nirvikar Singh[1] examines the functioning of some of India’s institutions of governance, namely, the legislative and executive branches of government, the judiciary, and the bureaucracy, from an instrumental, economic perspective. After analyzing the myriad dimensions of governance in the context of the “degree of commitment or durability of laws and rules, and the degree of decentralization of jurisdictions with respect to local public goods”, he concludes the governance in India reflects “insufficiencies in all the above dimensions with adverse consequences for economic efficiency”.
Mr.Pradip Bhattacharya’s[2] main complaint against the Indian bureaucracy is regarding it “sheer size” and “pruning” it might provide scope of Politics. Donald F. Kettl is the Stanley I. Sheerer Endowed Term Professor in the Social Sciences at the University of Pennsylvania, director of the Feels Institute of Government and professor of political science. He is also a nonresident senior fellow at the Brookings Institution in Washington, D.C. Kettl is the author of numerous books, including System under Stress: Homeland Security and American that the “push and pull of political forces make the functions of bureaucracy ever more contentious, but no less central to governance”. The following questions they put before them for their study are crucial for our own research in this work:
-
- What is the nature and purpose of bureaucracy?
- How do public organizations work and why do they behave the way they do?
- How are administrative decisions actually made?
Messer’s Kettl and Fesler convey the political and management realities of public organizations through vivid examples” and it is hoped the some of the analysis being made in the present work here would be of some help in answering these above questions.
James W. Fesler is the Alfred Cowles Professor Emeritus of Government at Yale University. He received the Dwight Waldo Award of the American Society for Public Administration “for distinguished contributions to the professional literature of public administration,” and the John Gauss Award of the American Political Science Association for “a lifetime of exemplary scholarship in the joint tradition of political science and public administration.” His books include Area and Administration, The Independence of State Regulatory Agencies, and Public Administration.
Constitutional morality is not a natural sentiment. It has to be cultivated. We must realize that our people have yet to learn it. Democracy in India is only top-dressing on an Indian soil which is essentially undemocratic.
Mr. Bhattacharya castigates the all-pervasive mentality of public servants who are forever eager to pass the colloquial “buck” to someone else to get rid of the problem of decision making for fear of being thrown out by the “system or sent into orbit on the peripheries,” for “refusing to fall in line” and the learned writer describes the scenario thus:
Honest officers get no support from colleagues when victimized, for the gangrene of ‘everyone for himself’ has spread throughout the administrative system. While most look the other way and pretend nothing has happened, or deprecate the tactlessness and impracticality of the unfortunate man of integrity, a different type of reaction is seen in the attempts by some maverick officers to form a party of their own seeking to reform the polity, thus displaying a completely altered perception of the role of the civil servant in society.
Mr. Bhattacharya says the what is called for in good governance is the combination of the “older values of probity and political independence with the newer qualities of leadership, excellence, openness, productivity and dynamism” and not mere rhetoric’s like the one’s contained in Declarations made periodically on important occasions like passing out parades at national academia’s’. Referring to the occasion of the “retreat” at Mussoorie, he admonishes:
“ It might have been instructive if, while retreating, they had taken a look at what a ruler merely twenty years old, had to say when swearing in the Principal Secretary of the State, if familiarity with Sardar Patel’s advice had produced its usual consequence (“Today my Secretary can write a note opposed to my views. I have given the freedom to all my Secretaries. I have told them, ‘If you do not give your honest opinion for fear that it will displease your Minister, please then, you had better go.’ I will never be displeased over a frank expression of opinion.”
The Mussoorie Resolution made a clarion call for accountability being made a “real feature” of administration. While admitting the we were quite far from the goal of attaining “justice, equity and order,” it exhorts the public service to rededicate itself to the “blossoming of the genius of our nation” keeping uppermost in mind the new and vibrant “partnership between all the instruments of governance and the people they seek to serve”. Mr. Bhattacharya questions if “responsiveness, commitment, awareness and accountability”, espoused in the National Training Policy document formulated by the Government of India is achievable if the character of those in charge of public trust is flawed, and their “integrity questionable and probity not beyond doubt”? Training of the bureaucracy, according to him would remain “value-neutral” so long as the “rent-seeking” behavior of those in administration goes unchecked.
Drawing inspiration from late Mr. Seshan who lamented the” the dignity of the individual, the inner strength of human character and the courage to accept and do only the which a man in his conscience believes to be correct… is as deplorable today in the age of supersonic aircraft as it was in the age of the bullock-cart. Mr. Bhattacharya calls for introspection and feedback based upon experiential learning so the “we can get together to design the necessary steps of the institution building process required”.
Indeed, the objectives underlying the establishments like the National Training Academia in India both at the Central and the State Governments level were to ensure that the administrative machinery is sensitive to the dynamics of development and responsive to the socioeconomic aspirations of its citizens. Accordingly, the training programmed for the Civil Services have focused inter alia on:
(a) Responsiveness: to the challenging democratic needs and expectations of the citizens and organizational and technological developments.
(b) Commitment: to democratic values and concept of partnership and participative decision-making.
(c) Awareness: of technological, economic and social developments
(d) Infusion of scientific temper.
(e) Accountability: to ensure high performance in every professional field and cost effective methods of delivery.
In the ultimate analysis, we have to acknowledge the unenviable fact that a country of such dimension as India cannot be administered by one man. There are about 1300 million people of diverse proportions, views, language, financial pressures and political obligations. It is of importance that each one of us in whatever capacity we can must contribute our might to discipline ourselves and give a helping hand to our government.
TODAY is a day when this dictum must resolve itself into a proclamation. We are in turbulent situation. We are at WAR of a different kind. We are fighting an unseen enemy –a “microbe” and for which we have not developed any adequate tool. The only equitable and probable instrument is social or physical distancing for which the Prime Minister himself has appealed. We are grateful for this small and infinitesimal request of the government. Let us whole heartedly cooperate with our own regime. All that the Prime Minister is exhorting, among other things, is social distancing among fellow beings, for a small period of time with a view to contain the dreaded virus. It is believed, on expert findings (as noted in earlier posts) that Social distancing, or physical distancing is a set of non-pharmaceutical interventions or measures taken to prevent the spread of a contagious disease by maintaining a physical distance between people and reducing the number of times people come into close contact with each other. It involves keeping a distance of at least six feet (two meters) from others and avoiding gathering together in large groups.
By reducing the probability that a given uninfected person will come into physical contact with an infected person, the disease transmission can be suppressed, resulting in fewer deaths. The measures are combined with good respiratory hygiene and hand washing.
To slow down the spread of infectious diseases and avoid overburdening healthcare systems, particularly during a pandemic, several social distancing measures are used, including the closing of schools and workplaces, isolation, quarantine, restricting movement of people and the cancellation of mass gatherings.
Let us take a serious view of the Hon’ble and beloved Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi and cooperate. Interpersonal relationships are social associations, connections, or affiliations between two or more people. They vary in differing levels of intimacy and sharing, implying the discovery or establishment of common ground, and may be centered on something(s) shared in common. The interruption in this inter relationship for a grave reason and greater purpose and that too for each one of us own protection is too small a price to pay in a WAR like situation . Why not take advantage of it and treat it as a blessing in disguise and view it as a benediction. For instance, among other things cigarette and tobacco shops and wine stores are closed. To quote a personal account, I might take this opportunity to mention that on account of a severe fall and consequent surgery with a need to be in hospital for several days, I gave up both smoking as well as drinking. It takes about 21 days determination to cheat the brain to ignore the urge to smoke or drink. After 21 days if the longing continues, it might be easier to continue the ‘lockdown’ for another 21 days. I promise that we can overcome this “wretched and enervating habit” and in the process give ourselves a much needed peace, prosperity and domestic happiness and tranqility.
Such compulsory quarantining also provides us psychologically too. We could utilize the time now available to build up an ‘intra personal’ relationship with the “self”. Intrapersonal means communicating with one’s self. On the other hand, interpersonal communication refers to an individual’s ability to communicate with other people. The ability to communicate ideas, thoughts and feelings serves as the basis for all successful human interaction. Meditation is one such result arising out of intrapersonal relationship.
The lockdown would also help people to catch up with reading.
Four hundred years ago, Edward Gibbon, an English historian, Member of British Parliament and author of “The History of the Decline and fall of the Roman Empire” praised Indian culture of reading thus: :
It is impossible to make an Indian give up his love for books for any amount of wealth in Exchange.
Of all the pastimes in the world, reading is the best and it symbolizes culture. For, reading moves the mind, blooms in thoughts and flows through veins. It touches the heart, tones up the heartbeat and makes one respond.
Books are humankind’s best companion and in countries where literacy is low are precious commodities. All those who deal with books, be they libraries, publishers, dealers or ordinary bookstores do yeomen service to communities by making them available for reading. This must have been the reason, which made Francis Bacon to say that reading makes a perfect human being. Bartholin, a western Librarian went even further to proclaim:
Should there be no books, even the God would go dumb, the Goddess of Justice would close her eyes, Science, Philosophy and the rest would be enshrouded in an abysmal darkness of ignorance.
…to be continue in part 6
With regards and prayers for your wellbeing and happiness,
PVJois
[1] Nirvikar Singh was a Professor of Economics at the University of California, Santa Cruz (UCSC), where he held the Sarbjit Singh Aurora Chair of Sikh and Punjabi Studies. He also directed UCSC’s Center for Analytical Finance, and its South Asian Studies Initiative. He was a member of the Advisory Group to the Finance Minister of India on G-20 matters
[2] Indian politician who is well heard