2020: The ESSENCE of CHARACTER- CORONAVIRUS- PEACE OF MIND or MIND at PEACE-Part 6

Your true character is revealed by the clarity of your convictions, the choices you make, and the promises you keep. Hold strongly to your principles and refuse to follow the currents of convenience. What you say and do defines who you are, and who you are…you are forever[1]

“All over the world, people are being quarantined and are being compelled to practice social distancing. We are trying desperately to remain sane in a world that seems bordering on the insane. So, the time is just right for us to ponder, reflect, meditate, and discover the world within our own minds.”

― Avijeet Das

Fear of the unknown

While the many events of the past century including the host of inventions and discoveries liberated society from captivity and slavery, a new climate of fear – a fear of the unknown came into being by the middle of the last century. There came about the “Cold War” era – a euphemism to describe the post-World War II geo- political tensions that built up between the Soviet Nation and its satellites on the one hand and three other powerful nations of the world in those days-the U.S.A., Britain and France on the other. The latter were allies with the former during the World War II but fought over the spoils of the war.   It was clear that the world had learned “nothing” from the past and instead of oneness, nations’ practiced “brinkmanship”. During this period (the Cold War epoch), the world again stood witness to periods of terrifying and heightened tension.[2] International crises arose one after the other:[3]

Berlin Blockade (1948–1949);

Korean War (1950–1953);

Berlin Crisis of 1961;

Vietnam War (1959–1975);

Soviet war in Afghanistan (1979–1989);

1962 Cuban Missile Crisis (1962);

NATO exercises in November 1983.

The world breathed a sigh of relief with two major events that took place in the last two decades of the century. Firstly, the fall of the Berlin Wall on November 11 1989 largely liberated people from types of confinement and suppression unknown to the world before. This one event in itself brought about a physical change in the constitution of world governance and economies of a kind not experienced prior to that time. The world became more democratic and consensual in outlook. Nobel Laureate Amartya Sen observed thus:

The Berlin Wall was not only a symbol of keeping people inside East Germany- it was a way of preventing a kind of global view of our future. We could not think globally about the world when the Berlin Wall was there. We could not think about the world as a whole…

If I celebrate the fall of the wall, it is because I am convinced of how much we can learn from each other. Most knowledge is learning from the other across the border. [4]

The second occasion was the ending in 1990 of the Cold War. The increased diplomatic, military, and economic pressure by the United States on the Soviet Union, which was already suffering from severe economic stagnation and the co-operation on the part of the new dispensation in the Soviet Union, which saw the introduction of such drastic reforms as the “perestroika” and “glasnost”, led to such a result.

Just about the time when the global society began comprehending the simple logic underlying the proverb “united we stand and divided we fall” coinciding with the dawn of the New Millennium, the world got shattered by cataclysmal events which could neither be condemned as war or regarded as some sporadic reckless acts by misguided people. These were simply frightening-even to describe. It is impossible to know if anyone could have dreamed that the world would be witness to the kind of gruesomeness of 9/11, 13/12 or 26/11 to name a few of the disasters. All that remained after the happenings were the debris- of men, women, children and materials and DUST.

Although globalization and 21st Century technology for communication have made countries realize the futileness of war in the traditional sense, yet, there is an eerie silence regarding the potential use of the same technology for destruction purposes-for obtaining Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD). The nomenclature adopted now to describe such acts is “terrorism.” These are acts on the part of a few malevolent people diabolically intent on destabilizing any attempt at unification of peoples around the globe. If left unchecked it will start consuming one by one the four pillars upon which the security of people and nations rests- food, energy, water and climate.[5]                                                                                               

Professor Yehuda Bauer (born 1926) is a historian and scholar of the Holocaust. He says:

“Never be a perpetrator. Never allow there to be victims. And never, never allow yourself to be a bystander—to be indifferent.”

Never before have had so many people so much in common, but never before have the things that divide them also been so obvious. The world is full of opposites. Those who live in the rich industrialized countries of the north have labeled the twentieth century as an era of economic miracles. However, the average value of goods and services has risen by leaps and bound, as is the case with the growth of the rich. It is said that if in 1989 there were 157 billionaires and 2 million millionaires there are now more than 300 billionaires. The poor see it in a different way. There are 100million homeless, 400 million people undernourished, and two billion people drink and bathe in contaminated water. 40 million more people around the world have been pushed into hunger in 2008.[6]

With less than 400 billionaires holding assets equaling the total worth of 45 percent of the world’s population, the developing countries want to see a change in the flow of resources for reduction of the divide between the rich and the poor. The world has realized that no nation can live in isolation to enjoy the luxuries of their prosperity. They have come to believe that redistribution of their national wealth among other nations for rebuilding or development has become necessary albeit for mutual benefit.[7]

Culture shock

An article on Culture Change and East West Cultural Differences   attempts to trace the origin of the term “migrant” or an ‘expatriate’ (abbreviated to “ex-pat or expat”). While the term is commonly used to refer to a Westerner who resides in a ‘foreign’ country, it comes from the Latin ‘ex patria’. Translated, it means ‘outside the native land’. Its origin is said to have appeared in Latin texts for more than 2000 years and refers to “Roman soldiers who left their homeland to fight battles for the expansion of the Roman Empire”. Anyone who lives away from their home country can be described as a foreign resident, expatriate, ex-pat or expat. People of Thailand call them “farang” or aliens and Indonesians call them “bule”. In fact, “firangi” is a term used in Hindi or Urdu language. The term “Videshi” (the opposite of “deshi”) in Hindi speaking regions signifies a foreigner.

Life is difficult and not a bed of roses. A realization of this fact helps us concentrate on finding solutions to problems rather than mulling over difficulties. An expatriate must accept the fact that there are bound to be differences in the way of life at ‘home’ and in a ‘foreign’ country just as a bride realizes that she has to accept the new environs of her life in her new found home. Some might encourage a student (as is happening in Australia) to get back home but the same thing could apply to a newly wed bride too. In both cases, life might not turn out to be as well as planned and might end up in grief. There is wide divergence in the way people handle life’s challenges and its realities. This depends on the type of education, tradition, one’s religion, faith and their philosophies. In general, effective communication is the most important tool one can have to get along with people. Usually, a common language gives helps greater ability to communicate effectively with the people around us – our family, friends, work colleagues and even with strangers in public. Besides, what we have learned of our country’s history, our people’s habits, likes and dislikes, politics, religion, traditions; legal and judicial systems including our rights as a citizen and our own social norms influence our relationships and associations with foreigners’ in their countries. What happens to us applies equally well to foreigners’ who come to our country. This phenomenon is described as “cultural shock”.

Kalervo Oberg a world-renowned anthropologist is said to have travelled the world and written about his experiences so that others could enjoy them as well .

His cross-cultural comparisons led to him to understand the “shock” or anxiety felt by migrants while experiencing an unknown or new culture which he termed as a “culture shock”. This term expresses the lack of direction, a feeling of not knowing what to do or how to do things in a new environment, and not knowing what is appropriate or inappropriate.

Oberg discovered that the feeling of culture shock generally sets in after the first few weeks of coming to a new place and manifests itself in several ways:

“when to shake hands and what to say when we meet people, when and how to give tips, how to give orders to servants, how to make purchases, when to accept and when to refuse invitations, when to take statements seriously and when not. Now these cues which may be words, gestures, facial expressions, customs, or norms are acquired by all of us in the course of growing up and are as much a part of our culture as the language we speak or the beliefs we accept. All of us depend for our peace of mind and our efficiency on hundreds of these cues, most of which we do not carry on the level of conscious awareness”.

Now when an individual enters a strange culture, all or most of these familiar cues are removed. He or she is like a fish out of water. No matter how broad-minded or full of good will you may be, a series of props have been knocked from under you, followed by a feeling of frustration and anxiety.[8]

I have felt this syndrome very often on my trips abroad including the U.S. where I spend a longer time with my children who live there. A favourite preoccupation when on my daily constitutionals would be planning an early “return” notwithstanding the fact that I am with my kin there. This ought to be happening to many others too excepting for those compelled by circumstances to remain there due to professional commitments or otherwise. This phenomenon is inexplicable and it is so universal. This cultural shock is nothing but “home sicknesses”. P.G. Wodehouse, in one of his books describes the ‘misery” of an American’s enforced sojourn in France dreams all the time of “baseball” and a “ham burger” and of his glee upon finding a fellow American albeit a fraudster. The home environment suddenly assumes a tremendous importance. Everything of “home” becomes irrationally glorified. To a south Indian, the aroma of “home” food including its “filter coffee” becomes compelling

Culture shock takes many forms. Its major symptoms are loneliness, inattention, irritation and of unknown fears including hypochondria and in the main, a loss of identity of one’s self.

Kelervo Oberg describes some of the symptoms thus:

Excessive washing of the hands; excessive concern over drinking water, food, dishes, and bedding; fear of physical contact with attendants or servants; the absent minded, far-away stare (sometimes called the tropical stare); a feeling of helplessness and a desire for dependence on long-term residents of one’s own nationality; fits of anger over delays and other minor frustrations; delay and outright refusal to learn the language of the host country ; excessive fear of being cheated, robbed, or injured; great concern over minor pains and eruptions of the skin; and finally, that terrible longing to be back home, to be able to have a good cup of coffee and a piece of apple pie, to walk into that corner drugstore, to visit one’s relatives, and, in general, to talk to people who really make sense”. [9]

We can therefore describe culture shock as the physical and emotional discomfort one suffers when coming to live in another country or a place different from the place of origin. Often, the way that we lived before is not accepted or considered as normal in the new place. Everything is or looks different – language, accent, semantics, transport and communication. Utilities like their public telephone booth, their banking machines or a “flush” in the bathroom (or for that matter, not being aware of bathroom protocol or etiquette itself) baffle us.

Dr. Carmen Guanipa in an article on cultural shock while admonishing people over this syndrome as lack of understanding prefers that we take hold of ourselves and take the opportunity for leaning and acquiring new perspectives. In his view, “culture shock can make one develop a better understanding of oneself and stimulate personal creativity”

Gaining understanding of the new culture replaces our anxieties, distress and confusion by a new feeling of pleasure. A total metamorphosis takes place we begin to accept the customs of the country as just another way of living. The new milieu does not deter us anymore. We develop greater enthusiasm and self-confidence. Indeed, we have now begun to like the new environs and the earlier wish to ‘go back” recedes. Pre-occupied with things at hand to the exclusion of all other diversionary thoughts migrants begin to like the malls; the banks; the orderly “line’ or queue; the “way things work”; the cars; the traffic signals, the policemen and wardens and the communication system to name a few. It all boils down to our attitudes.

Charles Swindoll, acclaimed contemporary author and philosopher of our times says how attitude influences life:

“Attitude, to me, is more important than facts. It is more important than the past, than education, than money, than circumstances, than failures, than successes, than what other people think, say, or do. It is more important than appearance, giftedness or skill. It will make or break a company… a church… a home.

The remarkable thing is we have a choice every day regarding the attitude we will embrace for that day. We cannot change our past… we cannot change the fact that people will act in a certain way. We cannot change the inevitable. The only thing we can do is play on the one string, we have, and that is our attitude… I am convinced that life is 10% what happens to me and 90% how I react to it”.

And so it is with you… we are in charge of our attitudes.

Winston Churchill emphasized on attitude as the most important attribute in one’s life and “that makes a big difference” just as happiness itself is an attitude:

We either make ourselves miserable, or happy and strong. The amount of work is the same. [10] 

In the “State of Happiness-simply a matter of choice”[11] the first in the series of books, Dr. Jois talks of life that is riddled with complexities and complains of the dilemmas really on the part of people on how to react to them. Unfortunately, the trend is to give it up as a hopeless task.

Happiness comes through making the right effort and not just by luck. Dr.Jois tells us how a human derelict, Maxim Gorky(1868-1936) in the course of an aimless life discovered how to read and write at the hands of a friendly cook while working as a dishwasher on a Volga steamer and literature soon became his passion. Aleksey Maksimovich Peshkov adopted the pseudonym Maxim Gorky, meaning “the bitter one” to convey the bitterness of his life’s early experiences. He described the lives of people in the lowest strata and on the margins of society, revealing their hardships, humiliations, and brutalization, but also their inward spark of humanity. Gorky continually struggled to resolve contradictory feelings of faith and skepticism, love of life and disgust at the vulgarity and pettiness of the human world”. He left the following message to humankind:

“Happiness always looks small while you hold it in your hands,

but let it go, and you learn at once how big and precious it is.”

I think we have left out for the last but not the least, a very imperative aspect of our discussion. That is about our great front runners whose individual and collective efforts are what are keeping the unknown Dracula in check. We did not mention about our doctors’, nurses, paramedics, drug manufacturers and suppliers, grocers and others.

Armed forces during World War I depended on a range of methods to relay messages between units in an era when wireless communication was still primitive. Options ranged from the telegraph to telephones to colored flares, mirrors that reflected flashes of sunlight, bugles and trained dogs and pigeons. But the most reliable means of communicating along the front was in the form of one of the war’s most dangerous roles: the runner.

Human runners were more dependable than staticky connections on phone lines. They could memorize complicated messages in case papers they were carrying were destroyed or became illegible. And they could locate hard-to-find places.[12]

Now, we have virtually everything needed to communicate with each other, but that in itself has brought in several disadvantages needing governments of the day trying to prevent if unable to stop gossiping and fake news reporting to our own detriment.

The 2016 US election was marked by malicious uses of technology, including new forms of “fake news” on social media platforms designed to sway voters. Since then, there has been a striking number of cases of commercially and politically driven disinformation, foreign interference in elections, data breaches, cyber-attacks, the proliferation of harmful speech, data exploitation and surveillance abuses.

At this inflection point — in which democracies are strained by technologies — there is a pressing need for policy makers, civil society and the private sector alike to put forth a coordinated effort to govern the digital public sphere…[13]

LET US ALL RESOLVE ONCE AGAIN TO COMPLY WITH ALL DIRECTIVES ISSUED BY OUR GOVERNMENTS AT THIS WORLD DEVASTATING CRISIS.

With regards and wishing you all good health and cheer,

PVJois

[1] https://www.successories.com/products/Posters-Art/Motivational-Posters/Essence-of/18/3703/The-Essence-of-Character-Motivational-Poster-251217@11116am

[2] Dr.PV.Jois – Global Oneness-a matter of understanding” by Dr.PV.Jois,1st Ed; October,2009; ISBN 978-81-907906-1-1; Vijaya Publication, Jwalamukhi Mudranalaya, Bangalore-

When this book was published the following calamities were still unknown:

 

[3] 1. The Iraq War was a protracted armed conflict that began in 2003 with the invasion of Iraq by a United States-led coalition that overthrew the government of Saddam Hussein. The conflict continued for much of the next decade as an insurgency emerged to oppose the occupying forces and the post-invasion Iraqi government. An estimated 151,000 to 600,000 Iraqis were killed in the first three to four years of conflict. US troops were officially withdrawn in 2011. However, following the spread of the Syrian Civil War and the territorial gains of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, the Obama administration decided to redeploy US forces to Iraq in 2014. Many former soldiers are employed by defense contractors and private military companies. The U.S. became re-involved in 2014 at the head of a new coalition; the insurgency and many dimensions of the civil armed conflict continue. The invasion occurred as part of the George W. Bush administration’s War on Terror, following the September 11 attacks. –

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_War

10042020

2.The September 11 attacks (also referred to as 9/11)[a] were a series of four coordinated terrorist attacks by the Islamic terrorist group al-Qaeda[3][4][5] against the United States on the morning of Tuesday, September 11, 2001. The attacks resulted in 2,977 fatalities, over 25,000 injuries, and caused at least $10 billion in infrastructure and property damage.[6][7] Additional people have died of dust-related cancer and respiratory diseases in the months and years following the attacks. – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11_attacks-10042020@1253pm

  1. The 2008 Mumbai attacks[10] (also referred to as 26/11) were a series of terrorist attacks that took place in November 2008, when 10 members of Lashkar-e-Taiba, a terrorist organisation based in Pakistan, carried out 12 coordinated shooting and bombing attacks lasting four days across Mumbai.The attacks, which drew widespread global condemnation, began on Wednesday 26 November and lasted until Saturday 29 November 2008. At least 174 people died, including 9 attackers, and more than 300 were wounded. –

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_Mumbai_attacks -10042020@1255pm

  1. The present Corona Virus of 2019-2020 crisis where the world got shattered by cataclysmal events which can neither be condemned as war or regarded as some sporadic reckless acts by misguided people. These are simply frightening-even to describe it.

https://books.google.co.in/books?id=jPKsDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA93&lpg=PA93&dq=If+I+celebrate+the+fall+of+the+wall,+it+is+because+I+am+convinced+of+how+much+we+can+learn+from+each+other.+Most+knowledge+is+learning+from+the+other+across+the+border.&source=bl&ots=TMMOCbiWTp&sig=ACfU3U0UM-DGX53F6mwaniF6WOxvbA0RTg&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjVt6T05d3oAhVm4zgGHZGaCQ8Q6AEwAHoECA8QKw#v=onepage&q=If%20I%20celebrate%20the%20fall%20of%20the%20wall%2C%20it%20is%20because%20I%20am%20convinced%20of%20how%20much%20we%20can%20learn%20from%20each%20other.%20Most%20knowledge%20is%20learning%20from%20the%20other%20across%20the%20border.&f=false

10042020 @1723pm

[5] Dr.PV.Jois, Global Oneness-a matter of understanding”, op cit.

[6] Today, some 821 million people suffer chronically from hunger. And although this is significantly fewer people than the numbers we saw a decade ago, hunger still kills more people than AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria combined. On May 28th, we observe World Hunger Day – https://www.google.co.in/search?dcr=0&source=hp&ei=_WCQXqXkPJmS4-EPxdW1yAw&q=how+many+people+have+pushed+into+hunger+today&oq=how+many+people+have+pushed+into+hunger+today&gs_lcp=CgZwc3ktYWIQAzoCCAA6BQgAEIMBOgcIABBGEPsBSjMIFxIvMGcxMTFnMTA2ZzExMWcxMDFnMTAwZzExMWcxMDZnMTAzZzExOGc5OWcxMDlnOTlKHggYEhowZzFnMWcxZzFnMWcxZzFnMWcxZzVnNWcyNlC0EVi-wQFgg8kBaABwAHgAgAF1iAGjH5IBBDM3LjiYAQCgAQGqAQdnd3Mtd2l6&sclient=psy-ab&ved=0ahUKEwjl1u7f6N3oAhUZyTgGHcVqDckQ4dUDCAo&uact=5#spf=1586520346620

10042020@1737pm

[7] Global Oneness-a matter of understanding” by Dr.PV.Jois,1st Ed;October,2009; ISBN 978-81-907906-1-1; Vijaya Publication, Jwalamukhi Mudranalaya, Bangalore-at Pp.12-14

[8] Ibid at pp.43-45

[9] ibid

[10] ibid

[11] Vijaya Publication, First Ed., 2008: ISBN978-81-907906-0-4; Jwalamukhi Mudranalaya, Bangalore

[12] https://www.history.com/news/world-war-i-runners-1917

10042020@0933am

[13] https://www.cigionline.org/interactives/2019annualreport/disinformation-and-social-media-a-global-governance-challenge?gclid=EAIaIQobChMIo-fvwqXd6AIVShSPCh0P_AYPEAAYASAAEgJcx_D_BwE

10042020@1239pm

 

2020: The ESSENCE of CHARACTER- CORONAVIRUS- PEACE OF MIND or MIND at PEACE-Part 5

“In these times when the majority are giving a premonition of doom,

when you and I are watching the media and feeling something

sinister is going to loom when we are being bombarded with messages

of the catastrophe, of Corona Virus

and feeling gloom…

 

These times of using masks & sanitizers

and of not hugging or shaking hands with

friends or family members…

 

of these times when the world is being

painted with dark shades of hate and fear,

and the majority are seeing the world as a place

of bad fate & tear… you come out with positive vibes & energy

and use bright colors of love and warmth

and paint a beautiful rainbow

of hope & good old cheer”

― Avijeet Das

Self-discipline

There is another, defect in our upbringings among other things. We do not like to stand in “lines” or “queues”. We want to be the “first” by any “means” fair or foul though the former aspect is generally absent. This applies more to our so-called “rich” “moneyed” and the influential who think that it is below their dignity to do so. They do not realize that if they behave like that in the U.S., among others, that would be the first step to come back home.

This is the time for us to change. Circumstances warrant this transformation. Times are frightening and dangerous. There are various restrictions and regulations in vogue now which call for understanding, tolerance and wisdom to follow voluntarily and if not, at least to “comply” with them under pain of penalty. Yet, however, we find open defiance by certain sections of society which apart from putting themselves or their family in immediate threat will hazard innocent neighboring fellow citizens.

When I was in Pittsburg in the U.S. visiting the Hindu Temple of Shri Balaji (the first built in America) I observed a very curious phenomenon. Whereas, those who congregated on the premises would never think of “throwing” litter on streets, highways or any other public places like for instance in or at a shopping mall within or outside the premises, here, in the sacred portals of a holy place, all kinds of litter particularly, cans were being thrown onto the fenced greenery adjoining the temple. Despicable such attitude is, it is unfortunate that there was no body to tell them otherwise. There was (at that time) not even a signboard warning visitors against littering. How similar to their conduct at home where all sorts of litter is thrown about most casually even by many of the “foreign returned” people. Many of our people including “netas” go on “jaunts” abroad. I wonder how self-controlled they would be? The reason is not far to seek. They are afraid of the “consequences” under law or even by the local population itself. It is doubtful if they come back within the expiry of their visitor’s visas if they are prosecuted for breach of their pollution laws particularly in the United States and Singapore.

Self-discipline is called for as an utmost moral and legal duty. Should we not comprehend this at least now?

Everyone must stand in a queue with other passengers while boarding a flight and go through normal security drills. Why have special lounges for VIPs’ at the airports?

Simplicity and accessibility were the hallmark of erstwhile national leaders. We had lost the meaning of these two, among other, qualities in our present times. That is because we had lot of people standing on the podia and claiming to be leaders and vying with each other to get into picture frames. Most of such people did not have or do not have a modicum of leadership qualities. All they hankered after were for privileges and more amenities including escorts and a red beacons on roof tops of their vehicles. They had not given up their spitting and other despicable habits. In any event, the security rings provided to them at the cost of citizens immunized them from public scrutiny.

Narendra Modi has changed the culture of the many of such so called leaders. Himself a pure soul, he does not want anything except the welfare of people. His entire energies and time available is utilized in this behalf. He CARES for the people without discrimination. He is stoic at the oppositions’ needless personal attacks and criticism. We, in general, are austere in the realm of leadership. Our present Prime Minister is an exception and is an outstanding and excellent person of an indescribable calibre or genre. His simplicity and self-discipline has become legendary. It might be relevant to note that when he had gone to the U.S. in October, 2014 (so soon after his installation as the Prime Minister) to address the General Assembly of the United Nations, he had also availed of the opportunity of visiting the White House to meet the U.S. President Barack Obama. It would please all to know that in an official dinner hosted by the U.S. President, Narendra Modi, who was fasting for those nine days of the Indian Festival NAVARATRI partook only hot water and sustained on YOGA making President Obama wonder how “Modi kept up such a rigorous schedule on just a diet of warm water and yoga…” Our Prime Minister, Narendra Modi has been very keen and has devised many ways of interacting with his fellow citizens. At the conclusion of his visit Modi made the following VISION statement:

“We have a vision that the United States and India will have a transformative relationship as trusted partners in the 21st century, the “vision statement said”.  

When Her Majesty the Queen Elizabeth I swore Sir William Cecil as the Secretary of State at her accession her confidence in him was spellbinding:

This judgment I have of you that you will not be corrupted by any manner of gift and that you will be faithful to the state and that without respect for my private will you will give me that counsel that you think best.

Similarly, the following statement of President George W. Bush while commending Mr. Justice Alberto Gonzales for Attorney- General of the U.S. tells us as to what constitutes leadership:

His sharp intellect and sound judgment have helped shape our policies in the war on terror — policies designed to protect the security of all Americans, while protecting the rights of all Americans. As the top legal official on the White House staff, he has led a superb team of lawyers and has upheld the highest standards of government ethics. My confidence in Al was high to begin with; it has only grown with time.

Over the past decade, I’ve also come to know the character of this man. He always gives me his frank opinion. He is a calm and steady voice in times of crisis. He has an unwavering principle, a respect for the law … I’m committed to strong, and principled leadership at the Department of Justice and Judge Al Gonzales will be that kind of leader as America’s 80th Attorney General.

It is a matter of sadness that, as a people, we idolize all and sundry standing on a podium even without their need to being there. We have been encouraged to believe that India is a poor nation consisting of poor people and that without the crutches of governmental support, would be unable to stand upon our own feet. Years of subjugation and servitude produced sycophancy in people’s DNA. “Leaders” dinned to the eager ears of those who mattered and listened to, that the country did not have the wherewithal for progress; that it did not have adequate resources for investment on agriculture, education, and infrastructure and for manufacturing goods. They indoctrinated innocents that the only alternative left to starving was distribution of poverty among all by taxing everything that looked rich except the corrupt and the select few who alone were licensed to thrive in islands of prosperity amidst an ocean of poverty.

In these circumstances, I feel pleasure in recalling the attitude of people who in spite of having the requisites to be called “BIG” go through life in simplicity. There is an incident I recollect when late Rajiv Gandhi was a passenger next to me after the aisle. Of course, this was long before the tragic events that overtook our country after the demise of Prime Minister, Smt.Indira Gandhi and before he was inducted into public life and later as Prime Minister of the country. Not wanting to miss a fine opportunity of talking to a man like him, I went up to him after we were airborne and talked to him. He spoke without any airs at all. His simplicity and kind eyes astonished me. I asked him if I could have his autograph and having no notepad gave him my boarding card and pen for the purpose. As I was taking the pen back from him it fell down when he apologized for it and bent to pick it up for me. It must be emphasized that these instances are a rarity at present times. May be we might blame it on the personal security surrounding such important public figures.

In the beginning after independence, leaders who mattered did not want to think big for fear of losing the image of socialism-a euphemism for poverty distribution. The focus was on scarcity. Many ambitious proposals including interlinking of the country’s major rivers known as the Inter-River Linking Project (IRL) have been mired in great controversies. One of the main issues facing water resources management in India has been the unevenly distributed water supply throughout the country. The IRL would have helped the nation in so many ways not the least of which was a boost for transportation and agriculture.

The matter lingered until the President of India revived it on the eve of the country’s 59th Independence Day, (August 15, 2002) in which he spoke of the importance of interlinking:

“Rainfall and floods are annual features in many parts of the country. Instead of thinking on interlinking of rivers only at times of flood and drought, it is time that we implement this programme with a great sense of urgency. We need to make an effort to overcome various hurdles in our way to the implementation of this major project. I feel that it has the promise of freeing the country from the endless cycle of floods and droughts.”

The matter of IRL is now before the Apex Court in response to a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed before it in October 2002.The court recommended the setting up of a Task Force to formulate a plan to link major Indian rivers by the year 2012 now extended to 2016. The government of India in December of the same year appointed a Task Force (TF) on Interlinking of rivers.

The debate in the matter is endemic because the subject is not free of doubts and fears.

Things were looking bleak on the Indian horizon until the early nineties when India awakened to a new dawn of developmental thinking.

Among one of the major accomplishments of India’s 21st century is the energy initiative. Nuclear Power is expected to provide a quarter of the nation’s electricity by 2050.

The unfortunate reality is corruption and wastage. Studies apprehend that “as much as 30 to 50 percent of the electricity generated in India may be lost along the delivery chain. Better maintenance and modernizing of cooling systems could significantly reduce the amount of energy needed to generate power.” The key to expanding India’s prosperity is through energy production, which implies investment in efficiency and integrity. It is in this context therefore that a speech made by Smt. Sonia Gandhi, Congress President, on 19th November 2010, at the 10th Indira Gandhi Conference titled ”An Indian Social Democracy : Integrating Markets, Democracy and Social Justice” at the Teen Murti House was bold and encouraging notwithstanding whatever flak she might receive at the hands of her detractors. As a shadow head of the then government, she acknowledged the problem of corruption and the moral challenges facing Indian society. Two aspects of her statement are significant:

“Graft and greed are on the rise. The principles on which independent India was founded, for which a generation of great leaders fought and sacrificed their all, are in danger of being negated.”

“Our economy may increasingly be dynamic, but our moral universe seems to be shrinking. Prosperity has increased, but so has social conflict. Intolerance of various kinds is growing… We are right to celebrate our high rate of economic growth. We must do all that we can to sustain it. However, let us not forget that growth is not an end in itself.”

She stated that India could not hide behind the growth story. Corruption, if not addressed, may turn into the biggest blockage in progress of India. Her speech gained benefit when the nation’s Prime Minister who inaugurated the conference echoed the same sentiments. Saying that we were living through a “momentous phase in the history of the social evolution of humankind”, Dr.Singh, the former Prime Minister reminded people that it was in the “minds of the people” that battles of ideas were “won or lost”.

We sought freedom to liberate ourselves from centuries of misrule, from the scourge of poverty, ignorance and disease, from tyranny and bigotry, from caste prejudice and communal divisions. Thus, the Constitution of India was a unique social charter – the boldest statement ever of social democracy.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has tried to reign in the activities of the government and has cautioned people against imitating Western countries and venture in for more growth for mere generation of more revenues. He warned that while higher growth created more wealth that could be invested in human and social development; it also led to greater inequalities simultaneously increasing expectations of the people at large. Underscoring that there was already a revolution of rising expectations underway in India that any government has to take note of, the greater challenge facing the nation was getting rid of the cancer of corruption in our public life. In this context therefore, India needed revitalizing institutions of development administration, which could deliver effectively our promise of livelihood security, the Right to Education, to employment, to food and to shelter.

The Prime Minister Mr. Modi has assured people of his administrative philosophy namely, “of less government and more of governance”. The administration of such a huge country with diverse compulsions each day is a daunting task.

Public administration in a democracy has to achieve a delicate balance. Bureaucracy must be powerful enough to be effective, yet accountable to elected officials and, ultimately, to the people. At this juncture it is relevant to point out the when in the year 2000 the NDA government moved for a comprehensive review of the working of the Indian Constitution on the experience of its working for over 50 years, the then opposition party namely the Congress and the left parties also rejected the idea of having a fixed term for the Lok Sabha on the ground the it would render the elected representatives unaccountable to citizens for the entire period of five years. Nevertheless they were willing to discuss any amendments the would strengthen the system of No-Confidence Motions in order to ensure that a government stays in power unless voted out by a two-thirds majority or more. It appears the when President K.R. Narayanan (as of then) cautioned the government against “revising” the Constitution, or the Parliamentary form of government, it was Mr. Lal Krishna Advani who prevailed on the Prime Minister to issue the necessary clarification, after a Cabinet meeting, that the proposed review would be within the framework of Parliamentary form of government and that the basic features of the Constitution would be out of its purview.

Accomplishment of such a delicate balance is of the essence of any good governance. Students like me, and those who are in or concerned with governance of people who have or placed their trust in them ought to be excited to note with gratification, of the considerable attention to such issues. Political scientists like Donald F. Kettl and James W. Fesler   have concluded that the purpose and content of public goods lies in its “delivery for public good” and for this to happen effectively the outlook of the bureaucrat has to be studied in the “perspective of the bureaucracy existing within a series of Chinese boxes”. The immediate box is that of the bureaucratic ethos which itself exists “within the box of the governmental environment.”

It is said the this “incredible complexity of these multiple layers of the bureaucrat’s make-up has to be analyzed and understood if an effective intervention for change is to be made.” Their opinion is that India has excellent laws but these alone are not enough for safeguarding public welfare or be effective “in the face of the all-pervasive rent-seeking behavior of the administration” In his opinion there is “palsy at the Centre and paralysis at the periphery’.

It is relevant to refer to our Supreme Court’s exhortations time and again to the bureaucracy that as trustees of society they are duty bound to exhibit “honesty, integrity, sincerity and faithfulness in implementation of the political, social, economic and constitutional policies to integrate the nation, to achieve excellence and efficiency in the public administration”. One of the said authors quotes Dr. B.R. Ambedkar.

In a paper presented before the International Law and Economic Conference at New Delhi in 2003, Mr. Nirvikar Singh[1] examines the functioning of some of India’s institutions of governance, namely, the legislative and executive branches of government, the judiciary, and the bureaucracy, from an instrumental, economic perspective. After analyzing the myriad dimensions of governance in the context of the   “degree of commitment or durability of laws and rules, and the degree of decentralization of jurisdictions with respect to local public goods”, he concludes the governance in India reflects “insufficiencies in all the above dimensions with adverse consequences for economic efficiency”.

Mr.Pradip Bhattacharya’s[2] main complaint against the Indian bureaucracy is regarding it “sheer size” and “pruning” it might provide scope of Politics. Donald F. Kettl is the Stanley I. Sheerer Endowed Term Professor in the Social Sciences at the University of Pennsylvania, director of the Feels Institute of Government and professor of political science. He is also a nonresident senior fellow at the Brookings Institution in Washington, D.C. Kettl is the author of numerous books, including System under Stress: Homeland Security and American that the “push and pull of political forces make the functions of bureaucracy ever more contentious, but no less central to governance”. The following questions they put before them for their study are crucial for our own research in this work:

    1. What is the nature and purpose of bureaucracy?
    2. How do public organizations work and why do they behave the way they do?
    3. How are administrative decisions actually made?

Messer’s Kettl and Fesler convey the political and management realities of public organizations through vivid examples” and it is hoped the some of the analysis being made in the present work here would be of some help in answering these above questions.

James W. Fesler is the Alfred Cowles Professor Emeritus of Government at Yale University. He received the Dwight Waldo Award of the American Society for Public Administration “for distinguished contributions to the professional literature of public administration,” and the John Gauss Award of the American Political Science Association for “a lifetime of exemplary scholarship in the joint tradition of political science and public administration.” His books include Area and Administration, The Independence of State Regulatory Agencies, and Public Administration.

Constitutional morality is not a natural sentiment. It has to be cultivated. We must realize that our people have yet to learn it. Democracy in India is only top-dressing on an Indian soil which is essentially undemocratic.

Mr. Bhattacharya castigates the all-pervasive mentality of public servants who are forever eager to pass the colloquial “buck” to someone else to get rid of the problem of decision making for fear of being thrown out by the “system or sent into orbit on the peripheries,” for “refusing to fall in line” and the learned writer describes the scenario thus:

Honest officers get no support from colleagues when victimized, for the gangrene of ‘everyone for himself’ has spread throughout the administrative system. While most look the other way and pretend nothing has happened, or deprecate the tactlessness and impracticality of the unfortunate man of integrity, a different type of reaction is seen in the attempts by some maverick officers to form a party of their own seeking to reform the polity, thus displaying a completely altered perception of the role of the civil servant in society.

Mr. Bhattacharya says the what is called for in good governance is the combination of the “older values of probity and political independence with the newer qualities of leadership, excellence, openness, productivity and dynamism” and not mere rhetoric’s like the one’s contained in Declarations made periodically on important occasions like passing out parades at national academia’s’. Referring to the occasion of the “retreat” at Mussoorie, he admonishes:

“ It might have been instructive if, while retreating, they had taken a look at what a ruler merely twenty years old, had to say when swearing in the Principal Secretary of the State, if familiarity with Sardar Patel’s advice had produced its usual consequence (“Today my Secretary can write a note opposed to my views. I have given the freedom to all my Secretaries. I have told them, ‘If you do not give your honest opinion for fear that it will displease your Minister, please then, you had better go.’ I will never be displeased over a frank expression of opinion.”

The Mussoorie Resolution made a clarion call for accountability being made a “real feature” of administration. While admitting the we were quite far from the goal of attaining “justice, equity and order,” it exhorts the public service to rededicate itself to the “blossoming of the genius of our nation” keeping uppermost in mind the new and vibrant “partnership between all the instruments of governance and the people they seek to serve”. Mr. Bhattacharya questions if “responsiveness, commitment, awareness and accountability”, espoused in the National Training Policy document formulated by the Government of India is achievable if the character of those in charge of public trust is flawed, and their “integrity questionable and probity not beyond doubt”? Training of the bureaucracy, according to him would remain “value-neutral” so long as the “rent-seeking” behavior of those in administration goes unchecked.

Drawing inspiration from late Mr. Seshan who lamented the” the dignity of the individual, the inner strength of human character and the courage to accept and do only the which a man in his conscience believes to be correct… is as deplorable today in the age of supersonic aircraft as it was in the age of the bullock-cart. Mr. Bhattacharya calls for introspection and feedback based upon experiential learning so the “we can get together to design the necessary steps of the institution building process required”.

Indeed, the objectives underlying the establishments like the National Training Academia in India both at the Central and the State Governments level were to ensure that the administrative machinery is sensitive to the dynamics of development and responsive to the socioeconomic aspirations of its citizens. Accordingly, the training programmed for the Civil Services have focused inter alia on:

(a) Responsiveness:   to the challenging democratic needs and expectations of the citizens and organizational and technological developments.

(b) Commitment:   to democratic values and concept of partnership and participative decision-making.

(c) Awareness:   of technological, economic and social developments

(d) Infusion of scientific temper.

(e) Accountability: to ensure high performance in every professional field and cost effective methods of delivery.

In the ultimate analysis, we have to acknowledge the unenviable fact that a country of such dimension as India cannot be administered by one man. There are about 1300 million people of diverse proportions, views, language, financial pressures and political obligations. It is of importance that each one of us in whatever capacity we can must contribute our might to discipline ourselves and give a helping hand to our government.

TODAY is a day when this dictum must resolve itself into a proclamation. We are in turbulent situation. We are at WAR of a different kind. We are fighting an unseen enemy –a “microbe” and for which we have not developed any adequate tool. The only equitable and probable instrument is social or physical distancing for which the Prime Minister himself has appealed. We are grateful for this small and infinitesimal request of the government. Let us whole heartedly cooperate with our own regime. All that the Prime Minister is exhorting, among other things, is social distancing among fellow beings, for a small period of time with a view to contain the dreaded virus. It is believed, on expert findings (as noted in earlier posts) that Social distancing, or physical distancing is a set of non-pharmaceutical interventions or measures taken to prevent the spread of a contagious disease by maintaining a physical distance between people and reducing the number of times people come into close contact with each other. It involves keeping a distance of at least six feet (two meters) from others and avoiding gathering together in large groups.

By reducing the probability that a given uninfected person will come into physical contact with an infected person, the disease transmission can be suppressed, resulting in fewer deaths. The measures are combined with good respiratory hygiene and hand washing.

To slow down the spread of infectious diseases and avoid overburdening healthcare systems, particularly during a pandemic, several social distancing measures are used, including the closing of schools and workplaces, isolation, quarantine, restricting movement of people and the cancellation of mass gatherings.

Let us take a serious view of the Hon’ble and beloved Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi and cooperate. Interpersonal relationships are social associations, connections, or affiliations between two or more people. They vary in differing levels of intimacy and sharing, implying the discovery or establishment of common ground, and may be centered on something(s) shared in common. The interruption in this inter relationship for a grave reason and greater purpose and that too for each one of us own protection is too small a price to pay in a WAR like situation . Why not take advantage of it and treat it as a blessing in disguise and view it as a benediction. For instance, among other things cigarette and tobacco shops and wine stores are closed. To quote a personal account, I might take this opportunity to mention that on account of a severe fall and consequent surgery with a need to be in hospital for several days, I gave up both smoking as well as drinking. It takes about 21 days determination to cheat the brain to ignore the urge to smoke or drink. After 21 days if the longing continues, it might be easier to continue the ‘lockdown’ for another 21 days. I promise that we can overcome this “wretched and enervating habit” and in the process give ourselves a much needed peace, prosperity and domestic happiness and tranqility.

Such compulsory quarantining also provides us psychologically too. We could utilize the time now available to build up an ‘intra personal’ relationship with the “self”. Intrapersonal means communicating with one’s self. On the other hand, interpersonal communication refers to an individual’s ability to communicate with other people. The ability to communicate ideas, thoughts and feelings serves as the basis for all successful human interaction. Meditation is one such result arising out of intrapersonal relationship.

The lockdown would also help people to catch up with reading.

Four hundred years ago, Edward Gibbon, an English historian, Member of British Parliament and author of “The History of the Decline and fall of the Roman Empire” praised Indian culture of reading thus: :

It is impossible to make an Indian give up his love for books for any amount of wealth in Exchange.

Of all the pastimes in the world, reading is the best and it symbolizes culture. For, reading moves the mind, blooms in thoughts and flows through veins. It touches the heart, tones up the heartbeat and makes one respond.

Books are humankind’s best companion and in countries where literacy is low are precious commodities. All those who deal with books, be they libraries, publishers, dealers or ordinary bookstores do yeomen service to communities by making them available for reading. This must have been the reason, which made Francis Bacon to say that reading makes a perfect human being. Bartholin, a western Librarian went even further to proclaim:

Should there be no books, even the God would go dumb, the Goddess of Justice would close her eyes, Science, Philosophy and the rest would be enshrouded in an abysmal darkness of ignorance.

…to be continue in part 6

With regards and prayers for your wellbeing and happiness,

PVJois

[1] Nirvikar Singh was a Professor of Economics at the University of California, Santa Cruz (UCSC), where he held the Sarbjit Singh Aurora Chair of Sikh and Punjabi Studies. He also directed UCSC’s Center for Analytical Finance, and its South Asian Studies Initiative. He was a member of the Advisory Group to the Finance Minister of India on G-20 matters

[2] Indian politician who is well heard

2020: The ESSENCE of CHARACTER- CORONAVIRUS- PEACE OF MIND or MIND at PEACE-Part 4

“My beloved brethren,

Praying from your home, is not an attack on your faith, Christianity or religion. We are avoiding a situation of patient … If not, We are going to die or be infected, because of other people, stubbornness, carelessness, arrogance, irresponsibility, recklessness , selfishness, foolishness, pride and greed. Let other people not suffer or die, because of your actions. 

Isaiah 26:20”

― De philosopher DJ Kyos[1] 

Events where a large number of people are in one place can increase the risk of transmission of viruses. If you are organizing a gathering, consider whether you can postpone, reduce size/frequency or cancel the event. If you decide to go ahead, you should assess the risks and reconsider any aspect that may increase risk of transmission.

Each day we hear of public authorities warning people to restrict the number of persons who can assemble in any one place lest there be a community spreading of the present Dracula virus. It may be 20 or 200, 50 or 500.Different states prescribe differently. For instance, the Australian Government advises that non-essential gatherings should be limited to less than 500 people; and non-essential meetings of critical workforces such as healthcare workers and emergency service workers should be limited.

People behave differently in the context of such lockdowns. Primarily such reflexes arise out of loneliness or lack of society.

From time immemorial man has been a gregarious animal. His chief vocation was nomadic and occupation was hunting – for food. He was also being hunted for the same reason. That’s why he has been xenophobic too. As Jack London says in his book on the “Human Drift” [2] the “history of civilization is a history of wandering, sword in hand, in search of food”.

“Unplanned, blind, automatic, spurred on by the pain of hunger, man has literally drifted his way around the planet…” It is very interesting to note of his description of pre- historic livelihood. He tells us how nature itself stopped such unplanned expansion by these nomads in their quest for more space. He talks of “unknown and unnumbered billions” being destroyed by one or other unpredicted calamities or diseases, “famines and pestilences” for which there was no cure.[3] It is frightening to note of the destruction of “scores of millions” of the population. Closer home, in India itself we have heard of the plague deaths in millions.

It is a great tribute to those in authority in the present times that are bold, and intelligent enough to prevent or at least predict and take prophylactic measures to halt or at least slow down the onset of any such dangerous happenings. We are or should be grateful for such leaderships. Otherwise, the consequences could have been calamitous more so in the context of the humongous growth of slums and labour ghettoes where, as it is, disease festers and famine is chronic. In this context we ought to remember the great philosopher, Thomas Robert Malthus who had laid down the doctrine of population,[4] No matter how rapidly humanity increases the subsistence the population is exponential and catches up with it:

Malthusianism is the idea that population growth is potentially exponential while the growth of the food supply is linear. It derives from the political and economic thought of the Reverend Thomas Robert Malthus, as laid out in his 1798 writings, An Essay on the Principle of Population.”[5]

Between 1947 and now, the population has exceeded by leaps and bounds and it is expected that India would surpass China’s population in the next few years. When Malthus lived (1766 – 1834) the global population reached its first billion (in 1804). Today we have 7.6 billion. Malthus had predicted already in 1798 that population will outrun food supply leading to famine, conflicts over resources, etc.[6]

India is the world’s largest producer of milk, pulses and jute, and ranks as the second largest producer of rice, wheat, sugarcane, groundnut, vegetables, fruit and cotton. It is also one of the leading producers of spices, fish, poultry, livestock and plantation crops.

With a population of 1.27 billion India is the world’s second most populous country. It is the seventh largest country in the world with an area of 3.288 million sq kms. It has a long coastline of over 7,500 kms. India is a diverse country where over 22 major languages and 415 dialects are spoken. With the highest mountain range in the world, the Himalayas to its North, the Thar desert to its West, the Gangetic delta to its East and the Deccan Plateau in the South, the country is home to vast agro-ecological diversity.[7]

India is also the world’s leader in its monolithic Railways as well as for its post offices strength.

The Indian Railways’ track is spread across a massive 115,000 km, making it the largest rail network in Asia and the world’s second largest network operated under a single management. The entire track covers a route length of 67,368 km.[8]

It is heartening to note of the tremendous effort of our Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi and, under his benign leadership, his dedicated team who has throughout his reign emphasized on an inclusive growth for the economic wellbeing of the country. In particular, he has worked without looking at the clock for the welfare of the poor and those of our unfortunates brethern who are below the poverty line who see GOD, “except in the form of bread.”

As the Mahatma had said:

“There are people in the world so hungry, that God cannot appear to them except in the form of bread.”

-Mahatma Gandhi (1869-1948)

Franklin Roosevelt[9] had observed:

“True individual freedom cannot exist without economic security and independence. People who are hungry and out of a job are the stuff of which dictatorships are made.”

Mr.Narendra Modi’s entire focus is on the alleviation of the poverty stricken people of the country and all his energies have been directed towards the poor. He has focused his energies and time available in this direction. One is reminded of what Abraham Lincoln[10] had described power:

Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man’s character, give him power.

In this connection, it is relevant to recall the former Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh’s emphasis also on the healthy respect for workers and investment in their welfare, corporate social responsibility, employment to the less privileged, resist excessive remuneration and discourage conspicuous consumption, and investment in people and in their skills. Elaborating further, the former Prime Minister had urged, as has Mr. Narendra Modi on several occasions pleaded the industry to desist from non-competitive behaviour, invest in environment-friendly technologies, promote enterprise and innovations, fight corruption at all levels and promote socially responsible media and finance and socially responsible advertising.

Emphasizing on the need for Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Dr. Manmohan Singh asked the industry to remember the perceptive words of Lord Keynes on the positive social role of private enterprise in 19th century Europe. Himself, a great economist of the century, the former Prime Minister referred to Lord John Maynard Keynes, the British economist whose ideas have profoundly affected the theory and practice of modern macroeconomics who had, in “The Economic Consequences of Peace”, in the year 1925, had said:

“…European Society was so framed as to throw a great part of the increased income into the control of the class least likely to consume it. The new rich of the 19th century were not brought up to large expenditures, and preferred the power which investment gave them to the pleasures of immediate consumption. In fact, it was precisely the inequality of the distribution of wealth which made possible those vast accumulations of fixed wealth and of capital improvements which distinguished that age from all others. If the rich had spent their new wealth on their own enjoyments, the world would long ago have found such a régime intolerable. But like bees (these captains of industry) they saved and accumulated, not less to the advantage of the whole community… (they) were allowed to call the best part of the cake theirs and were theoretically free to consume it, on the tacit underlying condition that they consumed very little of it in practice. The duty of “saving” became nine-tenths of virtue and the growth of the cake the object of true religion.”

Telling the industrialists that this was how modern capitalism had developed as a powerful entity in transforming social, economic and political scene all over, he further reminded them:

           You have all been the beneficiaries of our improved growth performance. When I read about the growing number of Indian millionaires and billionaires, about Indian companies buying up multinationals abroad, about our clogged airports, about the real estate boom, about new holiday destinations, about soaring CEO compensations, I know that you have benefited from the growth process.

Social upheavals throughout the world have arisen out of people going hungry. In the memorable novel “Gone with the Wind” by Margaret Mitchell, Scarlett O’Hara, the leading protagonist in the novel, cries out, as she suffers extreme hunger without any means to satisfy it:

As God is my witness, I’m never going to be hungry again. No, or any of my folks. If I have to steal or kill – as God is my witness, I’m never going to be hungry again.

There are many more quotations on hunger. It is heartrending to note of the following saying of the Hon’ble Prime Minister Mr.Narendra Modi. It will give us an insight to his courage, character and inclination towards the eradication of poverty and understand all his efforts we have seen in the past six years and of his promise to do more in the coming years. Let us sample the following statement and see if some of us who have not experienced hunger can transform ourselves to do something in the direction of assuaging the pain being experienced by those of our fellow citizens:

I was born in a very poor family. I used to sell tea in a railway coach as a child. My mother used to wash utensils and do lowly household work in the houses of others to earn a livelihood. I have seen poverty very closely. I have lived in poverty. As a child, my entire childhood was steeped in poverty – Narendra Modi[11]

Mr. Narendra Modi is GOD sent. He is a born leader. He has aptly described what leadership is:

If you call yourself a leader, then you have to be decisive. If you’re decisive, then you have the chance to be a leader. These are two sides to the same coin.[12]

Let us all take a vow that we shall rally behind the Hon’b;e Prime Minister in has efforts to contain and fight this impasse we are undergoing.

…continued in part 5

With regards to all of you and hoping better times,

PVJois

[1] https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/tag/quarantine

 

04042020@1419-De philosopher DJ Kyos(Kyos Magupe), Author and Motivational Speaker

 

[2] New York, The Macmillan Company @p.2

[3] ibid

[4]

Thomas Robert Malthus FRS was an English cleric, scholar and influential economist in the fields of political economy and demography. Wikipedia

Born: 13 February 1766, Westcott, United Kingdom

Died: 23 December 1834, Bath, United Kingdom

Contributions: Malthusian growth model: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malthusianism

070420230@1850

[5] ibid

[6] ibid

[7] http://www.fao.org/india/fao-in-india/india-at-a-glance/en/

07042020@1907.

It is relevent to note that in 1947 when India attained Independence the population of undivided India was approximately 390 million. After partition, there were 330 million people in India, 30 million in West Pakistan, and 30 million people in East Pakistan (now Bangladesh): https://www.google.co.in/search?dcr=0&source=hp&ei=PIKMXs-ZJo_C3LUP0ve9qAQ&q=india%27s+population+in+1947&oq=india%27s+population+in+1947&gs_lcp=CgZwc3ktYWIQAzICCAAyAggAMgYIABAWEB4yBggAEBYQHjIGCAAQFhAeMgYIABAWEB4yBggAEBYQHjIGCAAQFhAeMgYIABAWEB4yBggAEBYQHjoFCAAQgwFKNQgXEjEwZzEyMGcyMTNnMTA2ZzEwOGcxMjJnMTA4ZzEwN2cxMjBnMTAzZzExMWcxMTVnMTE1Sh0IGBIZMGcxZzFnMWcxZzFnMWcxZzFnMWc1ZzVnN1DHHFi6jQFgpZUBaABwAHgAgAG1AYgBuhKSAQQyNC4ymAEAoAEBqgEHZ3dzLXdpeg&sclient=psy-ab&ved=0ahUKEwjPp4byt9boAhUPIbcAHdJ7D0UQ4dUDCAo&uact=5#spf=1586266706089

07042020@1911

[8] https://www.google.co.in/search?dcr=0&source=hp&ei=H4SMXq3pCaSLmge17piABw&q=india+has+a+legest+railways&oq=india+has+a+legest+railways&gs_lcp=CgZwc3ktYWIQAzIICCEQFhAdEB4yCAghEBYQHRAeOgUIABCDAToCCAA6BAgAEAo6BwgAEEYQ-wE6BggAEBYQHjoFCAAQzQI6BAgAEA06CAgAEAgQDRAeOgUIIRCgAToICAAQFhAKEB5KNQgXEjEwZzExNGcxMTBnMTEwZzEwNWcxMDFnMTAyZzEwNmcxMDBnMTAxZzEzMmcxMTlnMTMySh0IGBIZMGcxZzFnMWcxZzFnMWcxZzFnMWc1ZzVnOFDhEFird2DPfWgAcAB4AIABogGIAfUVkgEFMTIuMTWYAQCgAQGqAQdnd3Mtd2l6&sclient=psy-ab&ved=0ahUKEwjt9JHYudboAhWkheYKHTU3BnAQ4dUDCAo&uact=5#spf=1586267185593

07042020@1918

[9] Franklin Delano Roosevelt (January 30, 1882 – April 12, 1945), often referred to by his initials FDR, was an American politician who served as the 32nd president of the United States from 1933 until his death in 1945.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franklin_D._Roosevelt-08042020@1645pm

[10] https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/abraham_lincoln_101343

08042020@1651pm

[11] https://www.brainyquote.com/authors/narendra-modi-quotes

08042020@1722pm: Read more at https://www.brainyquote.com/authors/narendra-modi-quotes

 

[12] ibid

2020: The ESSENCE of CHARACTER- CORONAVIRUS- PEACE OF MIND or MIND at PEACE-Part 3

“Set peace of mind as your highest goal, and organize your life around it.” ~Brian Tracy

Indeed, in the realm of infectious diseases, a pandemic is the worst imaginable calamity because it spreads beyond a country’s borders. We can have a bird’ eye view of the kind of pandemics that ravaged humanity in ancient times too. These examples may serve to illustrate that they had great similarities like the one we are presently witnessing.[1]

430 B.C.: Athens

The earliest recorded pandemic happened during the Peloponnesian War. It is said to have crossed boundaries and is claimed to have killed as much as two-thirds of the population.

The symptoms included fever, thirst, bloody throat and tongue, red skin and lesions

1350: The Black Death[2]

Responsible for the death of one-third of the world population, this second large outbreak of the bubonic plague possibly started in Asia and moved west in caravans. Entering through Sicily in 1347 A.D. when plague sufferers arrived in the port of Messina, it spread throughout Europe rapidly…

England and France were so incapacitated by the plague that the countries called a truce to their war. The British feudal system collapsed when the plague changed economic circumstances and demographics. Ravaging populations in Greenland, Vikings lost the strength to wage battle against native populations, and their exploration of North America halted.

1492: The Columbian Exchange

Following the arrival of the Spanish in the Caribbean, diseases such as smallpox, measles and bubonic plague were passed along to the native populations by the Europeans. With no previous exposure, these diseases devastated indigenous people, with as many as 90 percent dying throughout the north and south continents.

Upon arrival on the island of Hispaniola, Christopher Columbus encountered the Taino people, population 60,000. By 1548, the population stood at less than 500. This scenario repeated itself throughout the Americas.[3]

There have been epidemics, endemics and pandemics of varies genres and descriptions since then with fatalities of humongous dimensions. Notably, the 1665: The Great Plague of London killing over 20 per cent of London’s population; 1817: First Cholera Pandemic being the first of seven cholera pandemics in over the next 150 years. This wave of the small intestine infection originated in Russia, where one million people died spread to other countries Spain, Africa, Indonesia, China, Japan, Italy, Germany and America, consuming thousands of people for want of medicine. Although a vaccine was created in 1885, history tells us of the continuation of pandemics throughout the universe. The Third Plague Pandemic in 1855 started in China and moving to India and Hong Kong, the bubonic plague claimed 15 million victims;

The Russian Flu of 1889:

The first significant flu pandemic started in Siberia and Kazakhstan, traveled to Moscow, and made its way into Finland and then Poland, where it moved into the rest of Europe. By the following year, it had crossed the ocean into North America and Africa. By the end of 1890, 360,000 had died.

 

1918: Spanish Flu:

The avian-borne flu that resulted in 50 million deaths worldwide came to called as the Spanish Flu since it was a neutral country in the First World War and strict press Censorship was in vogue in several countries including England where it was quite widespread. At the time, there were no effective drugs or vaccines to treat this killer flu strain. Wire service reports of a flu outbreak in Madrid in the spring of 1918 led to the pandemic being called the “Spanish flu.”

1957: Asian flu:

Starting in Hong Kong and spreading throughout China and then into the United States, the Asian flu became widespread in England where, in a short period of about six months thousand became victims and soon thereafter a second wave followed in early 1958, causing an estimated total of about 1.1 million deaths globally. It was a great relief when scientists developed a vaccine was developed, effectively containing the pandemic.[4]

2003: SARS

First identified in 2003 after several months of cases, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome is believed to have possibly started with bats, spread to cats and then to humans in China, followed by 26 other countries, infecting 8,096 people, with 774 deaths.

SARS is characterized by respiratory problems, dry cough, fever and head and body aches and is spread through respiratory droplets from coughs and sneezes. Quarantine efforts proved effective and by July, the virus was contained and hasn’t reappeared since.

SARS was seen by global health professionals as a wake-up call to improve outbreak responses, and lessons from the pandemic were used to keep diseases like H1N1, Ebola and Zika under control.

And now, in the present era we have what is come to be known as “2019: COVID-19” an abbreviation for ‘corona virus Disease of the year 2019’.

On March 11, 2020, The World Health Organization announced[5] that the COVID-19 virus was officially a pandemic after barreling through 114 countries in three months and infecting over 118,000 people. And the spread wasn’t anywhere near finished. The WHO declared:

COVID-19 is caused by a novel coronavirus—a new coronavirus strain that has not been previously found in people. Symptoms include respiratory problems, fever and cough, and can lead to pneumonia and death. Like SARS, it’s spread through droplets from sneezes.[6]

India has been in the forefront in its battle to combat the deadly virus and rigorous implementation of “SOCIAL DISTANCING” has been thought of as one of the more effective prophylactic in addition to including the closing of schools and workplaces, isolation, quarantine, restricting movement of people and the cancellation of mass gatherings.

There are laws in each of the countries prescribing punishments of varying degree for violation of any such stringent law. It is tragic to see hundred and thousands of people, mindless of consequences, openly defying the laws. Most of the people, if not all, are aware that the spread of the disease is far and wide and has overtaken the previous day’s number of cases. As of date, the number of corona cases has exceeded 1100000 and the number of fatalities are nearing 100,000 the world over. People across the world do not know the significance of expressions like ‘lockdown’, ‘social distancing’ and the scope and content of the host of rules and regulations issued by governmental and quasi-governmental authorities with a view to containing the spreading of the earth shattering pandemic.

I remember that in early times and in fact, even as of today, in parts of South India women (not necessarily elderly and those who are widowed) practice what in a South Indian language is referred to as “MADHI” meaning strict social distancing and seclusion (not to be likened to any sort of exclusion or ostracisation, please note). Under this training such women after their morning ablutions and subsequent to their Prayers or “POOJA” do not permit even their own children and other family members to come very close to them nor touch them (and in case they do, they would have (the women, I mean) to take a bath again and change their sanctified clothes which they have washed themselves). They only mix and intermix with similarly placed women (whether in the household or elsewhere). Indeed, they do not even partake food or refreshments proffered by other members of their own family including their own daughters or daughters in law. They come out of their seclusion late in the evening after they have had their “tiffin” (light refreshment) cooked or made by themselves or another lady (married woman) temporarily practicing such distancing until the refreshment has been partaken.

Social Distancing has been practiced by people from the earliest times both during normal times as well as in extraordinary circumstances such as in times of epidemics or pandemics of the kind the world is going through present days by the dreaded corona disease.

Isolation, seclusion and quarantines  

The Floodwaters Arrive[7]

…In the six hundredth year of Noah’s life, on the seventeenth day of the second month, all the fountains of the great deep burst forth, and the floodgates of the heavens were opened…And the rain fell upon the earth forty days and forty nights…On that very day Noah entered the ark, along with his sons Shem, Ham, and Japheth, and his wife, and the three wives of his sons—…

Berean Study Bible [8]

“Through which the world of that time perished in the flood.”(Peter 3:6)

Genesis 7:4

“For seven days from now I will send rain on the earth for forty days and forty nights, and I will wipe from the face of the earth every living thing I have made.”

Genesis 7:17

“For forty days the flood kept coming on the earth, and the waters rose and lifted the ark high above the earth”

Genesis 8:2

The springs of the deep and the floodgates of the heavens were closed, and the rain from the sky was restrained.”

The Bible says:

“Forty days was the period from the resurrection of Jesus to the ascension of Jesus (Acts 1:3). According to Stephen, Moses’ life is divided into three 40-year segments, separated by his growing to adulthood, fleeing from Egypt, and his return to lead his people out (Acts 7:23,30,36).” [9]

Stevens Crawshaw[10] says that even before the arrival of the plague, the biblical notion of a 40-day period of purification had crossed over into health practices. After childbirth, for example, a new mother was expected to rest for 40 days.

Professor Emil Verner of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology has warned:

“Pandemics Depress the Economy, Public Health Interventions Do Not: Evidence from the 1918 Flu”

“The pandemic itself is just so destructive to the economy, so any policy that you can use that directly mitigates the severity of the pandemic can actually be beneficial for the economy,” Mr. Verner said. Stricter interventions “actually make it safer for economic activity to resume, and they mitigate the negative impact of the pandemic itself on mortality.” [11]

As recently as March 26th, 2020, together with his esteemed colleagues Sergio Correia and Stephan Luck explain the economic benefits of NON PHARAMACEUTICAL INTERVENTIONS (NPI). They not only result in less number of fatalities but also “mitigate the adverse economic consequences of a pandemic”[12]

It is therefore of a very high importance and indeed, it is CRUCIAL that each one of us regulate our self and practice social distancing, quarantining or isolating as the circumstances might demand of us not only in our own self-interest but more importantly in the interest of the nation at large. Among other things let us pay attention and adhere to governmental and or of its agencies guidelines in this regard some of which are enumerated below:[13]

  1. Practice good hand and sneeze/cough hygiene;
  2. Avoid handshaking and regularly disinfect high touch surfaces, such as tables, kitchen benches and doorknobs;
  3. Increase ventilation in the home by opening windows or adjusting air conditioning;
  4. Visit shops sparingly and buy more goods and services online;
  5. Avoid needless outings and travel;
  6. Care for the sick person in a single room if possible ;
  7. Both the sick person and the people caring for them should wear a surgical mask when they are in the same room;
  8. Protect other vulnerable family members, such as people over 65 years or people with a chronic illness, including, if practicable, finding alternative accommodation for them;
  9. Defer large meetings and in any case do not attend any such gatherings;
  10. Promote strictest hygiene among food preparation (canteen) staff and their close contacts;
  11. If your child is sick, do not send them to school (or childcare);
  12. Instill the habit of sanitizing their hands at regular intervals;
  13. Hold essential meetings outside in the open air if possible;
  14. Limit food handling and sharing of food in the workplace

[1] https://www.history.com/topics/middle-ages/pandemics-timeline

-05042020@1921

[2] ibid

[3] ibid

[4] ibid

[5] On March 11, 2020

[6] Without a vaccine available, the virus has spread far and wide and has become universal and is estimated to have infected people in about 163 countries.

 

[7] https://biblehub.com/genesis/7-12.htm

04042020@1821

[8] https://www.google.co.in/search?dcr=0&ei=wcGJXv_VB9PZz7sPhLud6AU&q=is+the+berean+study+bible+accurate&oq=Berean+Study+Bible+&gs_lcp=CgZwc3ktYWIQARgBMgYIABAHEB4yBggAEAcQHjIGCAAQBxAeMgYIABAHEB4yBggAEAcQHjIGCAAQBxAeMgYIABAHEB4yBggAEAcQHjICCAAyAggAOgQIABBHOgUIIRCgAUoOCBcSCjExLTEyOWcxMTlKCggYEgYxMS0xZzNQy5EVWP-7FWCFshZoAHABeACAAbYBiAGPEJIBBDIuMTaYAQCgAQKgAQGqAQdnd3Mtd2l6&sclient=psy-ab#spf=1586086707714

05042020@1710

[9] https://www.google.co.in/search?dcr=0&source=hp&ei=pMWJXrv7BIuO4-EP-7yX4A4&q=%E2%80%9CForty+days+was+the+period+from+the+resurrection+of+Jesus+to+the+ascension+of+Jesus+%28Acts+1%3A3%29.+According+to+Stephen%2C+Moses%27+life+is+divided+into+three+40-year+segments%2C+separated+by+his+growing+to+adulthood%2C+fleeing+from+Egypt%2C+and+his+return+to+lead+his+people+out+%28Acts+7%3A23%2C30%2C36%29.%E2%80%9D+&oq=%E2%80%9CForty+days+was+the+period+from+the+resurrection+of+Jesus+to+the+ascension+of+Jesus+%28Acts+1%3A3%29.+According+to+Stephen%2C+Moses%27+life+is+divided+into+three+40-year+segments%2C+separated+by+his+growing+to+adulthood%2C+fleeing+from+Egypt%2C+and+his+return+to+lead+his+people+out+%28Acts+7%3A23%2C30%2C36%29.%E2%80%9D+&gs_lcp=CgZwc3ktYWIQA1DDHFjDHGCHNGgAcAB4AIABAIgBAJIBAJgBAaABAqABAaoBB2d3cy13aXo&sclient=psy-ab&ved=0ahUKEwi73Yvgm9HoAhULxzgGHXveBewQ4dUDCAo&uact=5#spf=1586087342145

05042020@1719

[10] Dr.Jane Stevens Crawshaw is a Renaissance Italian historian with research interests in the relationships between people and the places they inhabit. Her current project explores the impact of developing ideas about ‘cleanliness’ on the public health, urban and environmental policies of Venice and Genoa. Before this, she developed a holistic and contextualised institutional study of plague hospitals, which were first established in fifteenth-century Venice.

https://www.brookes.ac.uk/templates/pages/staff.aspx?wid=&op=full&uid=p0075724-05042020@1801

[11] https://www.google.co.in/search?dcr=0&q=%E2%80%9CThe+pandemic+itself+is+just+so+destructive+to+the+economy,+so+any+policy+that+you+can+use+that+directly+mitigate+the+severity+of+the+pandemic+can+actually+be+beneficial+for+the+economy,%E2%80%9D&spell=1&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi1-OnVn9PoAhVTxjgGHT6cA-4QBSgAegQIAxAp&biw=1085&bih=544#spf=1586157113746

06042020@1242

[12] https://twitter.com/emilverner?lang=en-060420230@1253

[13] www.health.gov.au/covid19-resources; useful https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/travelers/index.html

with best wishes,

PVJois

2020: The ESSENCE of CHARACTER- CORONAVIRUS- PEACE OF MIND or MIND at PEACE-Part 2

“Government didn’t say you must stop worshiping God;

You must stop praying or preaching the word of God;

You must stop believing in God or exercising your faith;

You must stop your religion, but what is asking for is everyone should stop human contact and should social distance themselves, because the virus spread easily in a group of people. By limiting contact, it means not going to church, Easter, clubs, Tavern, events, malls, gym, school, work. I need you to do your part in order for me to survive.”

― De philosopher DJ Kyos[1]

“The sprouting of the seeds of creativity, intuition and wisdom takes place in a relaxed mind. Only anger, greed and ego require a disturbed mind.”

― Shivanshu K. Srivastava

 

Social distancing or more appropriately physical distancing (because in the digital age we can still be “in touch” socially) is a more pertinent way to stop, prevent or slow down a pandemic infectious disease among people. It means less physical contact or closeness between people. This is all important at the present times since it has been established by scientists that COVID-19 is most likely to spread from person-to-person through or by direct close contact with any infected person or one who is suspected to be infected. A person is suspect when he or she is subject to coughs or sneezing or complaining of fever, for example. So, it is believed that the more space between people makes it harder for the virus to spread.

Social distancing, or physical distancing, is defined as a set of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPI) or measures taken to prevent the spread of a contagious disease by maintaining a physical distance between people and reducing the number of times people come into close contact with each other. It involves “keeping a distance of six feet (two meters) from others and avoiding gathering together in large groups.[1]

During the present (2019–2020) coronavirus pandemic, the World Health Organization (WHO) has “suggested the reference to “physical” as an alternative to “social”,” in keeping with the notion that it is a physical distance which prevents transmission; people can remain socially connected via technology.[2]

To slow down the spread of infectious diseases and avoid overburdening healthcare systems, particularly during a pandemic, several social distancing measures are used, including the closing of schools and workplaces, isolation, quarantine, restricting movement of people and the cancellation of mass gatherings. Such measures have been successfully implemented in several previous epidemics. For example, it is believed that in America, shortly after the first cases of influenza were detected in the city during the 1918 flu pandemic, authorities implemented school closures, bans on public gatherings and other social distancing interventions. The death rates in places where such measures were implemented were definitely lower than in places which had not imposed any restrictions on such inter public movements and other restrictions.[3]

Public authorities believe that social distancing measures are more “effective when the infectious disease spreads via droplet contact (coughing or sneezing); direct physical contact, including sexual contact; indirect physical contact (e.g., by touching a contaminated surface); or airborne transmission (if the microorganism can survive in the air for long periods).The measures are less effective when an infection is transmitted primarily via contaminated water or food or by vectors such as mosquitoes or other insects.” [4]

Under these circumstances, public health authorities monitoring the situation intently (as a result of thousands in the hospitals and the number of fatalities on account of the disease) have introduced strict ‘lockdowns’ of communities in one or more cities or the entire states in country inclusive of all modes of transports, markets or stores and shops (subject to certain exemptions like essential goods and supply, medical outlets and the like), schools, colleges and other teaching institutions, congregations or meetings for whatever purpose may be.

Consequently, if one feels sick or unwell it is expected (as a moral or legal obligation) to voluntarily seek medical help and subject oneself to isolation or quarantine as the case may be or as may be advised. Under such situation one is morally responsible to fellow citizens (inclusive of one’s own family) to stay away from others. Quite naturally one is obliged to practice personal hygiene in one’s own interest as well as his or her immediate family and surrounding people. As a Rule of the Thumb it is expected that the social or physical distancing would mean a minimum distancing among people of at least 3 to 6 feet.

As well as these, one could practice simple common sense actions to help reduce or mitigate hardships to oneself as well as others of the community. These simple, common sense actions help reduce risk to oneself and to others. They will help to slow the spread of disease in the community and therefore one can readily understand why schools, educational institutions, examinations, workplaces and public events for example, are closed. Each day and or periodically public authorities in consultation with experts (in addressing public health issues), regulates through orders and regulations called advisories answering and guiding queries from curious public seeking any clarification relating to the virus. They seek advice on what they should or ought not to do things under any given circumstance.

It is relevant to point out that as of date no definite cure has been found to alleviate the present calamitous and hazardous state of affairs. This disastrous condition has affected very severely the economic health of every nation in the world including small and big destinations.

Many people even in the most sophiscated countries are skeptical and mock at the restrictions placed upon them to contain the deadly virus. Perhaps this arises out of its drawbacks (social distancing) which include loneliness, reduced productivity and the loss of other benefits associated with human interaction.[5] Such cynics or critics do not realise that the present impasse gives them opportunities in various ways, chiefly, of practicing solitude which can be used to develop self-esteem and self- confidence; develop character, courage, enthusiasm, passion, and creativity. Solitude “issues in thought, conscience and creativity” These, in turn, “rebuild the world.”[6]

The more civilized humans became, building cities and forging trade routes to connect with other cities, and waging wars with them, the more likely pandemics became.

Jack London[7] in one of his books on the ‘Human Drifts’ talked of the pre-anthropoid “crossing a mountain divides in quest of better berry bushes beyond” always in search of more food and thus expanding more space.

Communicable diseases existed during humankind’s hunter-gatherer days, “but the shift to agrarian life 10,000 years ago created communities that made epidemics more possible.[8]

People ought to know that Social distancing measures date back to “at least the fifth century BCE…The biblical book of Leviticus contains one of the earliest known references to the practice..[9],

‘Further Jewish writings built upon this foundation… Rabbinic literature — as universally shared before the advent of germ theory — did not recognize the origin of contagious diseases, but did show that there was knowledge of the value of social isolation in preventing their transmission…During the Plague of Justinian, emperor Justinian enforced an ineffective quarantine on the Byzantine Empire, including dumping bodies into the sea, blaming the widespread outbreak predominately on “Jews, Samaritans, pagans, heretics, Arians, Montanists …”[10]

…to be continued in Part 3

Wishing all my readers good health,

PVJois

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_distancing

05042020@1808

[2] ibid

[3] ibid

[4] Ibid.

[5] Ibid.

[6] Johanna “Hannah” Cohn Arendt, also known as Hannah Arendt Bluecher, was a German-American philosopher and political theorist. Her many books and articles on topics ranging from totalitarianism to epistemology have had a lasting influence on political theory. https://www.google.co.in/search?dcr=0&source=hp&ei=St6JXsGrBOGU4-EPp5CKkAs&q=Arendt%2C&oq=Arendt%2C&gs_lcp=CgZwc3ktYWIQAzICCAAyAggAMgIIADICCAAyAggAMgIIADICCAAyAggAMgIIADICCABKCQgXEgU3LTExOEoHCBgSAzctMVCBEliBEmC3LWgAcAB4AIABU4gBU5IBATGYAQCgAQKgAQGqAQdnd3Mtd2l6&sclient=psy-ab&ved=0ahUKEwjB-Pags9HoAhVhyjgGHSeIArIQ4dUDCAo&uact=5#spf=1586093651270-05042020@1905

[7] John Griffith London (born John Griffith Chaney;January 12, 1876 – November 22, 1916was an American novelist, journalist, and social activist.- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_London-05042020@1843

[8] https://www.google.co.in/search?dcr=0&source=hp&ei=vNqJXrS2IOTCz7sPicekwAQ&q=but+the+shift+to+agrarian+life+10%2C000+years+ago+created+communities+that+made+epidemics+more+possible&oq=but+the+shift+to+agrarian+life+10%2C000+years+ago+created+communities+that+made+epidemics+more+possible&gs_lcp=CgZwc3ktYWIQA1CbGFibGGDiKWgAcAB4AIABAIgBAJIBAJgBAaABAqABAaoBB2d3cy13aXo&sclient=psy-ab&ved=0ahUKEwi0hJ3vr9HoAhVk4XMBHYkjCUgQ4dUDCAo&uact=5#spf=1586092741186

05042020@1850

[9] ibid

[10] ibid

[1] https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/tag/quarantine

04042020@1419-De philosopher DJ Kyos(Kyos Magupe), Author and Motivational Speaker

2020: The Essence of Character-Coronavirus pandemic-Pursuit of Happiness- part 1

Every obstacle presents an opportunity to improve one’s condition.[*]

The Prime Minister of India, Shri Narendra Modi, introduced,on 19th March, 2020, in the wake of the dreaded 2020 coronavirus pandemic, a new ritual called “Janata Curfew” meaning peoples’ own voluntary resolution to keep away from physical contacting with society outside, for almost a day. The term in vogue for this kind of distancing is “SOCIAL DISTANCING”. The idea underlying this Programme was to help ‘reduce’ community spreading of the said virus disease in India.

Coincidentally, 20 March was the International Day of Happiness! This day serves as a reminder that wealth should not be measured only in Gross Domestic Product (GDP), but Gross National Happiness (GNH). National levels of happiness and well-being are important to include in policy objectives to create more sustainable and inclusive societies. The good news is it doesn’t take a lot to make us happier. By designating a special day for happiness, the United Nations (UN) aims to focus world attention on the idea that economic growth must be inclusive, equitable, and balanced, such that it promotes sustainable development, and alleviates poverty. … The first International Day of Happiness was celebrated on March 20, 2013.[1]

It is important to note that the self-quarantine on the 22nd of March, 2020, proved to be a success leading to the country’s total “lockdown” for 21 days. This was announced on the 24th March 2020.

Dimensions of happiness

Kelly McGonigal, Ph.D., an eminent psychologist claims that stress is the enemy of well-being, of productivity, of happiness, and of health.

Pleasure is commonly understood as the positive stimulation of the senses. Too much happiness also could become a distressing occurrence and likewise, too much of pleasure could become a pain.   To quote a common example, when we have some pain a little pressure in that region is soothing but if the pressure is kept up the pain gets aggravated. This is the pain-pleasure relationship which we experience in our everyday lives. Mother Nature thinks of everything in order to keep us in balance so to say. The two attributes- pain and pleasure “seem irrevocably interlinked in the labyrinth of the human psyche. And perhaps it is this dilution which balances off the intensity of these emotions. Otherwise, the pleasure might be too exquisite to bear, or the pain too.” Aristippus of Cyrene[2] is believed to have held the view that pleasure is the ultimate “object of endeavor which includes all forms of mental pleasures like domestic love, friendship and moral commitment besides sensual gratification. The end result is that every living being exists for itself and achievement of one’s own happiness is the highest moral purpose”.

It is a common belief that good and pleasurable things in life must be eschewed in order to be of good for mankind as a whole. This is based on the assumption that self-denial is a virtue and that we are born to serve others. This abjection is questioned by all sensible people. Indeed it is doubtful if there is indeed self-sacrifice by anyone at all unless we list and classify different activities of human endeavor as good and those that are not. It is an altogether a different matter that certain people practice abstinence and other forms of self-denial for reasons best known to them but to say that abstinence alone is sacrificial and virtuous whereas pleasure in any form is not so would be an incorrect view of life and its magic. Here, the question arises if such virtues (of sacrifices-abstinence and the like) are in themselves not “pleasurable” to those practicing them? Were it not so then why are people indulging in them. There must be some form of beliefs that must be prompting such practitioners to undertake rituals. Were it not giving them pleasure then they have undertaken the practice which cause them distress begrudgingly. In such an event, the very purpose of any such rites cannot be equated with penance, ritual or sacrifice as they might understand them to be.

To justify such rituals on the ground that such forms are more passive and not openly visible to be “pleasurable” is to create a great divide between those who like to make the most of all that the Nature has bountifully endowed mankind with and those who for reasons best known to them opt to make use only a few out these faculties. To put it differently, let us take the example of some asanas in yoga. Some are so complicated and difficult that an onlooker might feel overwhelmed by the contorted actions and wonder about the purpose served by such intricate calisthenics. One ought not to overlook the fact that the practitioner of the yogic exercises is performing it for specific purpose underlying the same-either because it provides total bodily relaxation or the movements act as prophylactics for certain ailments. Thus to say that such practices involve bodily discipline and are very strenuous to perform and therefore not openly “pleasurable” per se and hence “sacrificial” is to give a wrong message to people. Each and every action has pleasurable contents in them although to a lay person it might at first blush appear unique and sacrificial. We would find a great deal of similarity in the kind of “sacrifices” that sportspersons undergo each day to stay fit and active which an ordinary person cannot withstand even for a single day. Under the circumstances, to propagate a theory that only actions like charity, compassion, humility, wisdom, mercy and sacrifice alone are “virtues” because of being “morally good” whereas indulging in open pleasure including sensual involvement is not so because there is no self-denial and sacrifice is tantamount to questioning why mankind is endowed with the capability of enjoyment.

After all, our aim is to live with happiness and pleasure and the means for achieving this end is unquestionable unless such means offend accepted cannons of social and public morals, mores, behaviour, etiquette and ethics in their accepted sense of the terms. Why is it necessary that we should practice self-denial except voluntarily for reasons of health or otherwise? It is not very strange that many advocates of abstemiousness preaching sacrifices are in the higher age groups-or put it more eloquently, after attaining a certain age when ordinary norms of pleasure do not attract or fascinate them. At the drop of a pin they preach renunciation, sacrifices and self denial. Let us beware of dubious advises from a host of such “spiritual” leaders. There is nothing to feel guilty about living with joy and pleasure, relaxation, taking a stroll in the park with one’s beloved, playing a game of golf or tennis, practicing yoga or only pranayama, doing bird watching, listening to music of one’s choice or for that matter doing nothing for a change if it gives pleasure. The menu is spread out far and wide. There are those who feel they are victims of nature’s conspiracy for everything that “is going wrong” even when by common understanding they are doing well. They are bestowed with everything, a happy family, children, grandchildren and their children and so on and yet are in search of sympathy all because of old age malaises like aches and pains. Some are even superstitious to the extent that they warn people around them not to laugh too much because it “foretells” of some unhappiness soon thereafter. Similarly, many of our body language is misleading. They do not convey if the person is happy, sad or in great grief. Some of us do not know when to nod the head to say “yes” and why they do a circulatory motion of the head to say “no”.

American political scientist James R. Rogers refers to the following for understanding the meaning of the right to “the pursuit of happiness” affirmed in the Declaration of Independence:[3]

The Massachusetts Constitution of 1780 affirms that “the happiness of a people and the good order and preservation of civil government essentially depend upon piety, religion and morality,

So, too, Article 3 of the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, afirms that “religion, morality, and knowledge” are “essential to the happiness of mankind.”

The right to “the pursuit of happiness” affirmed in the American “Declaration of Independence” affirms a right to chase after whatever makes one subjectively happy. It is important to observe that the ‘Declaration’ does not itself guarantee the “right to happiness” but quite naturally only the “right to pursue” what makes you happy. But this reading of the Declaration’s “pursuit of happiness” is wrong on both scores.

On the other hand, the Massachusetts Constitution of 1780 affirms that “the happiness of a people and the good order and preservation of civil government essentially depend upon piety, religion and morality” which signifies the right of citizens to publicly worship “God and of public instructions in piety, religion and morality”.

So, too, Article 3 of the Northwest Ordinance of 1787 above referred to which affirms that “religion, morality, and knowledge” are “essential to the happiness of mankind.”

The Hon’ble Prime Minister today(03042020@9AM-IST) addressed the nation exhorting the citizens to turn off all the electric lights in their homes on the 5th of April,2020, at precisely 9PM for 9 minutes and stand outside and hold lamps, candles, torch and the like to show oneness and unity among the citizenry,The underlying reason for this ritual is not explained. However, the concept of physical distancing was required to be uppermost in people’s mind. They were warned not to mix in gatherings.  This is akin to the exhortation of the 19th March above referred to for the Janata Curfew when all were requested to stand in their homes and “clap” or dumbbells to bring awareness among people and to show our acknowledgment and appreciation for the health care workers who were in the forefront battling the deadly virus so as to keep fellow citizens safe at home.

……to be continued in part 2

With regards to all and wishing everyone good health and peace,

PVJois.

*http://www.motivateus.com/stories/obstacle.htm200110-1038am

[1] The International Day of Happiness is celebrated worldwide every 20 March, and was conceptualized and founded by philanthropist, activist, statesman, and prominent United Nations special advisor Jayme Illien to inspire, mobilize, and advance the global happiness movement.[ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Day_of_Happiness-031119@457pm%5D

[2] Aristippus of Cyrene (/ˌærəˈstɪpəs/; Ancient Greek: Ἀρίστιππος ὁ Κυρηναῖος; c. 435 – c. 356 BCE) was the founder of the Cyrenaic school of Philosophy. He was a pupil of Socrates, but adopted a very different philosophical outlook, teaching that the goal of life was to seek pleasure by circumstances to oneself and by maintaining proper control over both adversity and prosperity. His outlook came to be called “ethical hedonism.”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aristippus-03042020@1302pm

[3] https://www.google.co.in/search?dcr=0&source=hp&ei=HueGXqP3ENyc4-EPsrql4Ak&q=james+r+rogers&oq=James+R.+Rogers+&gs_lcp=CgZwc3ktYWIQARgAMgYIABAWEB4yBggAEBYQHjIGCAAQFhAeMgYIABAWEB4yBggAEBYQHjIGCAAQFhAeMgYIABAWEB4yBggAEBYQHlDpGVjpGWCPPmgAcAB4AIABXYgBXZIBATGYAQCgAQKgAQGqAQdnd3Mtd2l6&sclient=psy-ab#spf=1585899302708-03042020@1307pm

2019: The Essence of Character-

Every obstacle presents an opportunity to improve one’s condition.[1]

International Day of Happiness (“Happiness Day”)

It is a common fact to see mute spectators joining a project requiring several hands in co-operation. I recently saw an advertisement on the television where a boy who is sitting in a car finds himself getting late to school on a rainy day because there is a tree lying across the road and blocking the road. In a spontaneous action, that surprised everyone, the boy, un-straps his bag-pack and alone, takes the lead to move the obstruction, drenching him in the process. Seeing him in this gigantic effort, others who were standing till then as silent spectators join the child and complete the job quickly earning the gratitude of hundreds of those using the road. We see such occurrences happening at homes, schools, workplaces or in any organization. This reminds me of yet another story which would underscore the moral we learned in the above example. The story would also tell us that obstacles in our life’s path like for example, pain are inevitable but really are lessons for our own good. Suffering from pain is optional. We can choose to be strong. It is not misfortune that produces suffering, but an improper reaction to circumstances. This tale is about a good king in ancient times who, in order to test his peoples’ mentality, has a boulder placed on a roadway and hides himself and watches to see if anyone would remove the obstruction. Some of the king’s wealthiest merchants and courtiers passing by simply walked around it even while blaming the king for not keeping the roads clear, but none did anything about getting the big stone out of the way. Then a peasant came along carrying a load of vegetables on his head. On approaching the boulder, the peasant laid down his burden and tried to move the stone to the side of the road. After much pushing and straining, he finally succeeded. As the peasant picked up his load of vegetables, he noticed a purse lying in the road where the boulder had been. The purse contained many gold coins and a note from the king indicating that the gold was for the person who removed the boulder from the roadway. The peasant learned what many others never understood.

Society places a lot of obstacles in the way of people and this includes the children. Indeed, there must be so many adults in the crowd who might be feeling lost out in the race with life. They too nurture the small child within them. The following story explains this phenomenon:

 

The Inner Child in Us All

I know for certain I have it. The doubts, the self-loathing at times, the inadequacies I feel, lack of self-esteem. You name it. Some have been disputed; some have been laid to rest, or even fell into the “doesn’t exist” category. Some have even been pushed down in denial or fear that they may really exist. Most don’t. But try telling that to a grown adult who is really fairly happy, has everything, yet deep down….the words…playing on ones psyche; on ones subconscious like the soft haunting background music of defeat, still exist. The words of sadness, negativity, evil and hurt. .. The actions or lack thereof that hurt as well, that should never have been.

And to make it worse, have to deal with the rest of one’s life, fighting the negatives, over a few years of screwed up childhood….The suffering and pain. For the most part, I myself personally have come to peace with all that which wrongly happened. I refuse to suffer over something too, that they have no clue about, would never admit, and further, don’t even believe they did anything wrong anyway.

But still….that inner child is always there. Looking for assurance. Looking for peace. That child only ever wanted to be loved.[2]

Anne Frank who was fifteen years old when she died in the Bergen-Belsen concentration camp in 1945 and suffered unspeakable horrors and torture ate concentration camp was still a wise person to know and experience   yet even at a young age, she was wise enough to know, and experience, and that good people make the world a better place. If this young girl faced with such horrifying shocks was able to see and understand the value of good deeds, those of us who live a life of comfort should be able to grasp and apply the concept readily. As Frank said, “you don’t need to wait another minute to start improving the world around you”. So, what are we going to do? Surprise our self and others!. Anne Frank said

 

“How wonderful it is that nobody need wait a single minute before starting to improve the world.”

She went even further to motivate us and said:

“We can make the world a better place right now. We don’t have to wait. Let us begin by saying something nice to the next person we see. Write a sympathy note to someone who recently suffered a loss in their family. The easiest way to improve the world is by making a positive difference in others’ lives. You can create a work of art; write a poem; learn something new; begin to recycle; walk instead of drive. We can make a difference in society if everyone of us did one more thing per day to improve the world around us.”[3]

 

20 March is the International Day of Happiness! This day serves as a reminder that wealth should not be measured only in Gross Domestic Product (GDP), but Gross National Happiness (GNH). National levels of happiness and well-being are important to include in policy objectives to create more sustainable and inclusive societies. The good news is it doesn’t take a lot to make us happier. Check out this video of visitors to UNHQ talking about what makes them happy, then think about what happiness means to you and let us know in the comments section![4]

By designating a special day for happiness, the United Nations (UN) aims to focus world attention on the idea that economic growth must be inclusive, equitable, and balanced, such that it promotes sustainable development, and alleviates poverty. … The first International Day of Happiness was celebrated on March 20, 2013.Mar 20, 2019[5]

With regards,

PVJois

[1] http://www.motivateus.com/stories/obstacle.htm

200110-1038am

[2] http://www.experienceproject.com/stories/Know-We-All-Have-It/775414

280110-1048am

[3] PV.Jois “State of Happiness-it is a matter of choice”. Jwalamukhi Mudranalaya, Bangalore.

[4] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=igqiTFqDt98-031119@455pm

[5] The International Day of Happiness is celebrated worldwide every 20 March, and was conceptualized and founded by philanthropist, activist, statesman, and prominent United Nations special advisor Jayme Illien to inspire, mobilize, and advance the global happiness movement.[ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Day_of_Happiness-031119@457pm%5D

The Essence of character-Part Three- VIRTUE

The High Street to happiness and peace is assuredly virtue and character.

Any dictionary or thesaurus will edify the term virtue or character or tranquility.

VIRTUE has several synonyms: goodness, virtuousness, righteousness, morality, ethicalness, uprightness, upstandingness integrity, dignity, rectitude, honesty, honorableness, honorability, honour, incorruptibility, probity, propriety, decency, respectability, nobility, nobility of soul/spirit, nobleness, worthiness, worth, good, trustworthiness, meritoriousness, irreproachableness, blamelessness, purity, pureness, lack of corruption, merit; principles, high principles, ethics.

Tranquility simply said, is the quality or state of being tranquil or calm. Its synonyms are many. They include peace, peacefulness, restfulness, repose, reposefulness, calm, calmness, quiet, quietness, quietude, silence, hush, noiselessness, stillness, serenity, sedateness, placidity, mildness. A look at a dictionary would give us many more of its equivalents. They would include, again, calm, calmness, placidity, composure, coolness, cool-headedness, serenity, contentment, content, even-temperedness, self-possession, control, equanimity, unexcitability, unflappability, imperturbability, restraint, self-restraint, stoicism, sobriety.

Its antonyms are strife, commotion, busyness, excitability. The noun strife means being

angry or having bitter disagreement over fundamental issues. It means a conflict as for example

“Strife within the community”

The synonyms of “strife” include, besides a “conflict” above illustrated, friction, discord, disagreement, dissension, variance, dispute, argument, quarrelling, wrangling, bickering, controversy, contention; disharmony, ill feeling, bad feeling, bad blood, hostility, animosity; informal falling-out. The dictionary gives an example of “the history of the Empire is full of strife” Harmony, peace and cooperation and character are the chief constituents of life enhancing emotions.

Thus the expression “happiness” which is sought with so much obsessiveness by humankind rests within the parameters of above few paragraphs. Now we know the “what” of happiness and the question staring at most, if not all of us, is how to acquire and retain for ourselves this ostensibly simple expression “happiness. As Maxim Alexander Gorky had enjoined:

“Happiness always looks small while you hold it in your hands, but let it go, and you learn at once how big and precious it is”.

…………….to be continued in part Four

With regards to you all,

PVJois

Principled Centered Leadership

Leadership and learning are indispensable to each other.

-John F. Kennedy [1]

 

One gets amazed at the enthusiasm of many people at many events, to somehow squeeze into the frames of camera wielding persons clicking pictures of certain people. The rush is on account of an understanding (or misunderstanding) that the picture being taken is of a celebrity or some “leader”. In fact, those who do this might later on regret their needless impetuousness. The person whose picture was being “shot at” might turn out to be one “famous” for very wrong reasons. It is unfortunate but a reality that in many countries and India is no exception to it, there is too much of “idol” (and idle) worshipping of people who simply claim prominence by virtue of any kind of position or place in society. Such “worshipping” is not restricted to any particular sport, cinema or politicking. The flip side to it is that the same “celebrity” is downgraded very soon afterwards. The phrase for this is “being in the limelight” albeit it is for a few seconds. The funny part is that the people in the background “nod” or mimic the “performer” in every respect as though they hold a brief for him or her. If they “nod” then we would find many heads nodding.

We are confusing “leaders” with “leadership”. They are different. In this connection, the following observations of Stephen R. Covey, author of “Principled Centered Leadership”, [2] is relevant to note. He emphasizes on teaching core values to our children like “primary greatness” as opposed to “secondary greatness”:

We teach them (children) that there are two kinds of greatness: primary greatness-which is the principle-centered character-and secondary greatness, which is the greatness that the world acknowledges. That’s been a constant theme. We try to inspire them to go for primary greatness first and not to compensate for character weakness by substituting or borrowing strength from secondary sources (popularity, reputation, possessions, natural talents, and so on”[3]

Charles Schulz[4]had this to say:

The people who make a difference in your life are not the ones with the most credentials, the most money or the most awards. They are the ones that care.

Under a title “Can I stay here forever?” Schulz reminded us:

The point is, none of us remember the headliners of yesterday. These are

no second-rate achievers. They are the best in their fields.

But the applause dies. Awards tarnish. Achievements are forgotten.

Accolades and certificates are buried with their owners. [5]

Not all those who climb on to a podium are leaders or in any case not principle-centric leaders. Many among them are self-centered people “grabbing” as much “attention” as possible. They do not excel. They do not shine in darkness like only a polished diamond can. John F. Kennedy would exhort that Leadership, not salesmanship was what was required in our people.

Stephen R. Covey says that there are certain traits in us that distinguish us from others in ever so many ways. He cites the example of principle-centered leaders who continually learn and spend most of their time reading, training, taking classes, listening to others and generally keep learning through both their “ears and their eyes”. They are curious and are always asking questions.[6] “They discover that the more they know, the more they realize they “don’t know; that as their circle of knowledge grows, so does its outside edge of ignorance”. Most of this learning and growth energy is “self-initiated and feeds upon itself”[7] They are service oriented who see life as a mission. Covey further finds that principle-centered leaders radiate positive energy, are cheerful, pleasant and happy besides believing and trusting others and treating life as some sort of an adventure. In addition, they are synergistic and exercise regularly for self-renewal.

regards,

PVJois

[1] http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/j/johnfkenn130752.html-090410-1245pm

[2] Covey, Stephen R, “Principled Centered Leadership”, Simon & Schuster, (1990)

[3] ibid, p.145

[4] Schulz Charles (October 1950-February 2000), American Cartoonist of the popular comic strip “Peanuts” which ran continuously for 50 years : http://www.snopes.com/glurge/schulz.asp-090410-1133am

[5] Schulz Charles, “Can I Stay Here Forever?”, http://nifr1982.blogspot.com/-090410-1141am

[6] Covey, Stephen R. “Principle –Centered Leadership”,Simon & Schuster (1992) at p.33.

[7] ibid

Integrity

“In the end, your integrity is all you’ve got                                                                     

                                                -Jack Welch, ex-CEO of General Electric [1]

 

 

When Mr. George W. Bush entered campaign for a second term he re-assured America of “steady, consistent, principled leadership”[2] and promised, among other things, a transformation of the nation’s tax systems. He felt that the most solemn duty of the American president was to protect the American people.

Freedom; Liberty and Individual dignity indeed, form the core of the cherished goals of America and the avowed ambition enshrined in our own Constitution.

Principled leadership and principle-centered leaders apply moral and ethical standards of “right” and “wrong” – values and virtues – to policy development and decision-making in business, government and the non-profit sectors. Principled leadership happens when men and women of good character and integrity take the helm of an organization or enterprise and let their principles drive their actions.[3] And so, while commending Mr. Justice Alberto Gonzales for Attorney-General of the U.S. the President is reported to have eulogized: –

His sharp intellect and sound judgment have helped shape our policies in the war on terror — policies designed to protect the security of all Americans, while protecting the rights of all Americans. As the top legal official on the White House staff, he has led a superb team of lawyers and has upheld the highest standards of government ethics. My confidence in Al was high to begin with; it has only grown with time.

Over the past decade, I’ve also come to know the character of this man. He always gives me his frank opinion. He is a calm and steady voice in times of crisis. He has an unwavering principle, a respect for the law … I’m committed to strong, and principled leadership at the Department of Justice and Judge Al Gonzales will be that kind of leader as America’s 80th Attorney General.”

 

Others and indeed even the controversial moralist like William John (Bill) Bennett,[4] suggest there are “universal” virtues that encompass all cultures that should be used to guide all behavior. Bennett extols virtues – including:

  • Self-discipline
  • Compassion
  • Responsibility
  • Friendship
  • Work
  • Courage
  • Perseverance
  • Honesty
  • Loyalty
  • Faith

 

Principle-centered behavior is promoted in the “Four Way” test enjoined by Rotary Clubs all over the world:

 

  1. Is it the truth?
  2. Is it fair to all concerned?
  3. Will it build goodwill and better friendships?
  4. Will it be beneficial to all concerned?

 

The Good Conduct Medal in Armed Services is commonly awarded for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity in active military service.[5] They mean so much more. For example, the Good Conduct Medal instituted in the USA depicts:

 

The eagle, with wings spread, denotes vigilance and superiority. The horizontal sword denotes loyalty, and the book represents knowledge acquired and ability gained. On the reverse, the lone star denotes merit. The wreath of laurel and oak leaves denotes reward and strength.[6]

 

The Medal glorifies the person, his family, his city, his friends and the entire nation and in turn, the recipient glorifies the decoration.

There is a dearth of principle-centered leadership in our public administrations. We have too many leaders but not many with leadership attributes. A long time ago, Mr. Justice Balkrishna Iyer had warned[7] that the Constitution can only provide for an administration but “how far such administration is seen” to be good, bad or ugly, only time alone would tell. Now, nearly sixty years later and in the light of the strictures and indictments of our administrative quality by a chain of commissions and other bodies entrusted with the duty to report on the system, we can admit, if we have the courage so to do, that our administrations have not shown themselves to be good. We would be doing a great service to ourselves if we look around to imbibe leadership qualities which alone can transform us into a prosperous, buoyant and proud nation. It is heartwarming that there are many ongoing programmes in our country to inculcate leadership qualities in the youth of our today and all of us should wish them well. Integrity is basing of one’s actions on an internally consistent framework of principles. Depth of principles and adherence of each level to the next are key determining factors. One is said to have integrity to the extent that everything one does and believes is based on the same core set of values. While those standards may change, it is their consistency with each other and with the person’s actions that determine the person’s integrity.

The concept of integrity is directly linked to responsibility in that implementation spawning from principles “is designed with a specific outcome in mind”. When the action fails to achieve the desired effect, a change of principles is indicated. “Accountability is achieved when a faulty principle is identified and changed to produce a more useful action.”[8] There must be a firm adherence to a code of especially moral or artistic values.

Those who lack in integrity are likened to “clouds and wind that bring no rain.” [9]

When what people think, say, promise, and do, all coincide, they have integrity. They have unshakable character. They have our trust and respect. They also have a good reputation because they are reliable and responsible.[10]

A building without integrity may receive structural damage, or even collapse, in a storm. Similarly, people without integrity are “blown about by the winds of misfortune and destroyed by catastrophes, for they lack the firmness, solidity, and strength of character to weather any storm.”

Besides integrity, sincerity, humility, courtesy, wisdom and charity are prerequisites for success.[11]

Integrity is about principle centered living. It is about doing what is right rather than what is expedient. We have integrity when we are the good person we appear to be. For this reason Socrates (469 ~ 399 BC) is believed to have taught:

 

The greatest way to live with honor in this world is to be what we pretend to be.[12]

 

There are many stories about character, commitment and integrity and of what is not but a few of them are difficult to shake off. Some of them are cited below:[13] One is about the Great Philosopher Socrates himself:

 

  1. It is said that Socrates, an epitome of virtues and of integrity placed his life at risk by refusing to carry out orders that were immoral. He was sentenced to die by a court for “impiety.” It transpires that he could have escaped the severe punishment by repentance which he did not choose to. When his admirers planned an escape attempt he seems to have aborted the same on the ground that it was only right that he should suffer whatever penalty was rendered on the ground that however unjust as it might seem to be it was an order of a duly constituted body and hence must be obeyed.

 

  1. In another case it is told that General Robert E. Lee [14] was offered a huge salary to head an organization in name only; he refused on the ground of immorality.

 

  1. Bobby (Robert Tyre) Jones (1902 ~ 1971) was a lawyer and amateur golfer. He was also the first to achieve the Grand Slam – winning in a single year the four major tournaments.

In a national championship, he drove his ball into the woods, and accidentally nudged it. Although no one saw him move the ball, he penalized himself one stroke, which caused him to lose the game by that margin. When praised for his integrity, he said, “You might as well praise a man for not robbing a bank.”

 

  1. This is about what integrity is not. It is about Lance a well read and energetic but a little more than blunt in his comments and remarks about others who are in contact with him He would tell people that they are too overweight or that they are “stupid”. His ascribes hurt. When asked why he was so abrupt he would say that he couldn’t help it because he was honest and told what he felt without any hide and seek. It did not matter to him one bit if others could not handle the truth said about them.

The following commentary about Lance’s behaviour is as interesting as the story told:

 

Integrity is noble, Lance’s behaviour is not. Integrity springs from the desire to do what is RIGHT. Lance’s conduct is an attempt to prop up his falling self-esteem. Unable to think of something good to say about him, he points out the ‘weaknesses’ of others with the hope it proves he is superior. Integrity inspires others; Lance’s actions demean others. Integrity is about honesty. Lance is not honest because he lies when he says, “I can’t help it.” Of course he can help it, but he chooses not to change because bolstering his ego is more important to him than freeing others from the pain he inflicts.

When we commit to integrity we empower and free ourselves. Unencumbered by the fear of ridicule and rejection by others, we do what we believe is right. The rewards for doing so are many and include a growth in self-confidence and courage. The exhilaration of doing the right thing is like experiencing the joy of reaching the other shore by victoriously swimming against the current.[15]

With good wishes,

PVJois

 

[1] < http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/EI06Df01.html&gt;

[2]<http://www.usatoday.com/news/politicselections/nation/president/2004-09-02-convention-wrap_x.htm&gt;

USATODAY.com – Bush promises ‘principled leadership’ at home, abroad

[3] < http://www.annapolisinstitute.net/about/princ_leader.html&gt;

[4] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Bennett>

290808-523pm

[5]<http://www.tioh.hqda.pentagon.mil/Awards/GOOD_CONDUCT_MEDAL.htm&gt;

230308-1003am

 

[6]<http://www.tioh.hqda.pentagon.mil/Awards/GOOD_CONDUCT_MEDAL.htm&gt;

230308-1001am

[7] In Rayalseema Constructions v. Commissioner of Sales Tax. -AIR (1959) Madras, 382. ( Madras is now known as Chennai) as upheld by the Supreme Court-

Madras High Court decision in Rayalseema Constructions Vs. Dy. Commercial Officer -10 STC 345 (355-356) SC, affirmed by the Supreme Court in Dy. Commercial Officer, Madras vs Rayalseema Constructions -17STC 505 SC.

[8] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integrity&gt;

220308-937pm

[9]< http://www.personal-development.com/chuck/integrity.htm&gt;

230308-1117am

[10] ibid

[11] Menninger Dr. William (1899 ~ 1966), ibid

[12] ibid

[13] ibid

[14] After the U.S. Civil War, General Robert E. Lee (1807 ~ 1870) was offered $10,000 a year.

[15] <http://www.personal-development.com/chuck/integrity.htm&gt;

220308-942pm

Integrity

Principled leadership and principle-centered leaders apply moral and ethical standards of “right” and “wrong”- values and virtues-to policy development and decision-making in business, government and the non-profit sectors. Principled leadership happens when men and women of good character and integrity take the helm of an organization or enterprise and let their principles drive their actions.[i]

Moralists like William John (Bill) Bennett,[ii] suggest there are “universal” virtues that encompass all cultures that should be used to guide all behavior. Bennett extols virtues — including:

  1. Self-discipline
  2. Compassion
  3. Responsibility
  4. Friendship
  5. Work
  6. Courage
  7. Perseverance
  8. Honesty
  9. Loyalty
  10. Faith

Principle-centered behavior is promoted in the Four Way test enjoined by Rotary Clubs all over the world:

 

  1. Is it the truth?
  2. Is it fair to all concerned?
  3. Will it build goodwill and better friendships?
  4. Will it be beneficial to all concerned?

The Good Conduct Medal in Armed Services is commonly awarded for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity in active military service.[iii] They mean so much more. For example, the Good Conduct Medal instituted in the USA depicts:

The eagle, with wings spread, denotes vigilance and superiority. The horizontal sword denotes loyalty, and the book represents knowledge acquired and ability gained. On the reverse, the lone star denotes merit. The wreath of laurel and oak leaves denotes reward and strength.

The Medal glorifies the person, his family, his city his friends and the entire nation and in turn, the recipient glorifies the decoration.

There is a dearth of principle-centered leadership in our public administrations. We have too many leaders but not many with leadership attributes. A long time ago, Mr. Justice Balkrishna Iyer had warned[iv] that the Constitution can only provide for an administration but “how far such administration is seen” to be good, bad or ugly, only time alone would tell. Now, fifty years later and in the light of the strictures and indictments of our administrative quality by a chain of commissions and other bodies entrusted with the duty to report on the system, we can admit, if we have the courage so to do, that our administrations have not shown themselves to be good. We would be doing a great service to ourselves if we look around to imbibe leadership qualities which alone can transform us into a prosperous, buoyant and proud nation. It is heartwarming that there are many ongoing programmes in our country to inculcate leadership qualities in the youth of our today and all of us should wish them well. Integrity is basing of one’s actions on an internally consistent framework of principles. Depth of principles and adherence of each level to the next are key determining factors. One is said to have integrity to the extent that everything one does and believes is based on the same core set of values. While those values may change, it is their consistency with each other and with the person’s actions that determine the person’s integrity.

The concept of integrity is directly linked to responsibility in that implementation spawning from principles “is designed with a specific outcome in mind”. When the action fails to achieve the desired effect, a change of principles is indicated. “Accountability is achieved when a faulty principle is identified and changed to produce a more useful action.”[v] There must be a firm adherence to a code of especially moral or artistic values.

Those who lack in integrity are likened to “clouds and wind that bring no rain.” [vi]

When what people think, say, promise, and do, all coincide, they have integrity. They have unshakable character. They have our trust and respect. They also have a good reputation because they are reliable and responsible.[vii]

A building without integrity may receive structural damage, or even collapse, in a storm. Similarly, people without integrity are “blown about by the winds of misfortune and destroyed by catastrophes, for they lack the firmness, solidity, and strength of character to weather any storm.”

Besides integrity, sincerity, humility, courtesy, wisdom and charity are prerequisites for success [ix]

Integrity is about principle centered living. It is about doing what is right rather than what is expedient. We have integrity when we are the good person we appear to be. For this reason Socrates (469 ~ 399 BC) is believed to have taught:

The greatest way to live with honor in this world is to be what we pretend to be.[x]

[i] < http://www.annapolisinstitute.net/about/princ_leader.html&gt;

[ii] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Bennett>

290808-523pm

[iii]<http://www.tioh.hqda.pentagon.mil/Awards/GOOD_CONDUCT_MEDAL.htm&gt;

230308-1003am

[iv] In Rayalseema Constructions v. Commissioner of Sales Tax. : Rayalseema Constructions Vs. Dy. Commercial Tax Officer-10 STC 345 [355-356] [AIR, (1959), Madras]: This decision was later upheld by the Apex Court in Dy. Commercial Officer, Madras vs Rayalseema Constructions -17STC 505 SC.

[v] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integrity&gt;

220308-937pm

[vi]< http://www.personal-development.com/chuck/integrity.htm&gt;

230308-1117am

[vii] ibid

[viii] Menninger Dr. William (1899 ~ 1966), ibid

[ix] ibid

Regards to you all,

PVJois